Douglas Caddy

Douglas Caddy was born in Long Beach, California, on 23 March 1938. His father worked for the Shell Chemical Company and in 1954 was given the responsibility of building a new chemical plant at Norco, Louisiana. Caddy attended the Alcee Fortier high School in New Orleans. Both parents were supporters of Senator Joseph McCarthy as they admired his "spirited fighting against communism". (1)
Caddy shared his parents' views on the danger of communism and as a teenager became a strong supporter of Barry Goldwater. According to Gregory L. Schneider, "Caddy had admired Senator Joseph McCarthy, circulated petitions supporting McCarthy's efforts in New Orleans while a sophomore in high school and was an inveterate writer of letters to the editor in support of such conservative causes as the Bricker Amendment. He later became a volunteer worker for Phoebe and Kent Courtney's early publication, Free Men Speak , which grew out of that petition drive." (2)
Young Americans for Freedom
In September 1960, Caddy and a group of about 60 young people met at the home of William F. Buckley in Sharon, Connecticut. This meeting led to the formation of the Young Americans for Freedom (YAF). Caddy was elected as the YAF National Director. Claire Vaile later wrote that Buckley decided to mentor Caddy and his friends: "The loss of Goldwater for the Vice-Presidential nomination convinced Buckley that young conservatives in the GDP needed to be fostered from the top down. He believed that young conservatives, with his guidance, could change the American political discourse." (3)
As Susan Agnes Stussy has pointed out: "The group aimed to mobilize young conservatives in response to the dominant leftist movements of the 1960s, such as the Civil Rights and antiwar protests. Predominantly composed of white and Christian members, YAF advocated for U.S. military involvement in Vietnam, free-market economics, states' rights, and limited government intervention." (4)
John A. Andrew described how "encounters with fascism" during the Second World War had compelled people to feel uncomfortable with government overly regulating social behaviour and developed more liberal attitudes. (5) According to another historian, over the next twenty years, activists from YAF "worked at the grass roots to construct an alternative political culture based on their ideas, captured the Republican Party, and wound up profoundly reshaping American politics in the process." (6)
This view is supported by Wayne Thorburn, an historian and former YAF member: "it is clear that this was a group of future leaders in business, academia, government, law, and the media. It reminds us also that while it is interesting and informative to trace through the accomplishments of the organization over its years of activity, the real impact of Young Americans for Freedom has been its development of new generations of conservative leaders, individuals who would help bring about the conservative success of the 1980s and beyond." (7)
Robert Mullen Company
Caddy later recalled: "Upon completing my six months of active duty in the Army at the end of 1961 under a program that required me to serve an additional five and a half years in the reserves after which I received my Honourable Discharge, I enrolled in the New York University School of Law in 1962 in the evening division. During the day I worked in the Manhattan office of New York Governor Nelson Rockefeller on the staff of Lieutenant-Governor Malcolm Wilson who was a conservative Republican while Rockefeller was a liberal one. The office was located at 22 West 55 th Street and was a five-story townhouse privately owned by the governor. Only about forty people worked in the building as it was the inner sanctum of the Rockefeller political machine." (8)
After graduating from law school Caddy went to work for General Foods Corporation at its headquarters in White Plains, New York. In 1969, Caddy was sent to work for the Robert Mullen Company, which General Foods had retained for years as its public relations firm. In 1970 E. Howard Hunt joined the Mullen Company staff, having been placed there by Richard Helms, the CIA director, upon Hunt's alleged retirement from the agency. Hunt knew Caddy's mentor, William F. Buckley, who had worked under him as an agent for the CIA in Mexico City years earlier. (9)
Hunt recalls meeting Caddy for the first time in 1970 at the Robert Mullen Company. "Through CIA's placement service I was introduced to Robert Mullen, head of a small public relations firm in Washington…. The CIA placement officer had told me that the Mullen firm had "cooperated" with CIA in the past. This cooperation was identified as the firm's having established and managed a Free Cuba Committee for the CIA. So, I inferred that my CIA background would not prove a handicap to employment with Mullen as it had with several multinational firms." (10)
In April 1972, Caddy was called into the office of John Kilcullen, a partner in the Washington law firm where he worked. Kilcullen was a loyal Republican who told him that he had been asked to volunteer an attorney to work for the Lawyers Committee for the Re-Election of the President. He added that he had chosen Caddy for the job and that he had to report to John Dean, Counsel to the President. On 25 April Dean gave him instructions to help discover information that could be used to damage potential Democratic candidates for the presidency. (11)
Caddy was also contacted by E. Howard Hunt and he was asked to join him and Lawrence Houston, General Counsel to the CIA, at a restaurant on the Maryland side of the Potomac River. Houston asked Caddy if he was interested in going to work for the CIA and said that if I did, my assignment would be to construct a luxurious hotel on the seashore in Nicaragua into which the Communist Sandinista leaders would be lured and compromised. Caddy told Houston and Hunt that he would have to think about their proposal. However, he later recalled "in my mind I already knew it was something I could not pursue for personal reasons." (12)
Caddy now believes there was another reason for this meeting: "When E. Howard Hunt called me at the law firm where I worked in April 1972 and invited me to join him and CIA General Counsel Laurence Houston at a meeting in the empty dining room of a restaurant on the Maryland side of the Potomac River. Hunt did not disclose the purpose of the meeting. It turned out the ostensible purpose was to recruit me to join the CIA on a special project involving Nicaragua when in reality it was to scoop me out to be the go-to attorney if an event occurred in the near future." (13)
Watergate Break-in
On 17th June 1972, Frank Sturgis, Virgilio Gonzalez, Eugenio Martinez, Bernard L. Barker and James W. McCord were arrested during a break-in into the Democratic Party headquarters at Watergate Office Building. As soon as E. Howard Hunt had become aware of the arrests, he started making telephone calls: "My first was to lawyer Douglas Caddy… His sleepy voice didn't sound too happy. ‘Yes' he said. ‘Doug? This is Howard. I hate to wake you up, but I've got a tough situation, and I need to talk to you. Can I come over?' That was the beginning of Watergate – a scandal that would bring down a president and destroy my life in the process." (14)
Caddy later reported what Hunt said when he arrived at his house: "Hunt explained to me what had occurred inside the Democratic National Committee headquarters at Watergate culminating in the arrests of James McCord and the four Cuban-Americans. I was appalled at what I heard and immediately realised the dire threat it posed as a criminal case to the survival of the Nixon Administration…. From my apartment Hunt telephoned Gordon Liddy… Shortly before 5 a.m. both Hunt, in my apartment, and Liddy, on the telephone with me, retained my services as their attorney to represent them and the five arrested burglars in the case." (15)
G. Gordon Liddy now telephoned Jeb Magruder, the deputy director of the Committee to Re-Elect the President (CRP) to tell him, "That five of our men had been arrested in DNC headquarters" and that he should tell John Mitchell, the Attorney General, about what had happened. Mitchell then gave permission for Liddy to tell Richard Kleindienst, the Deputy Attorney General "to help get McCord out of jail right away – before it's found out who he really is." Kleindienst refused to help and so Liddy returned to his office and continued to destroy all the records of his illegal actions. (16)
The Watergate burglars first appeared in court for their arraignment on Saturday, June 17, 1972, just hours after their early-morning arrest. The only journalist in the courtroom was Bob Woodward. Several people who have researched the case believe that it was Carl M. Shoffler, a detective in the police department's intelligence unit, who had arrested the burglars, was the man who tipped off Woodward. In his book, Secret Agenda: Watergate, Deep Throat and the CIA (1984) Jim Hougan points out that both H. R. Halderman (The Ends of Power) and Carl Oglesby (The Yankee and Cowboy War) both believed that it was Shoffler who told Woodward about the Watergate burglars appearing in court that morning. (17)
E. Howard Hunt was also highly suspicious of Carl Shoffler. In an interview with Time Magazine he asked why Shoffler was in a position to arrest the Watergate burglars on 17 June 1972: "There were just too many fishy things that occurred. What was the Mod Squad (Shoffler's group) doing out on the street some two or three hours after they were supposed to be off duty? McCord was an electronic hitchhiker who shouldn't have been allowed on our operation… There were just too many things that went wrong for them all to be a coincidence." (18)
Shoffler, who had been injured on duty some months before, was assigned to desk work on the evening of 16 June 1972. His shift ended at 10.00 p.m., but he voluntarily undertook a second shift, joining a plainclothes tactical unit cruising the streets in the early-morning hours. Shoffler, who according to Carl Oglesby, already knew James W. McCord, was sitting with three other officers, in a parked police car, a minute from Watergate building when Watergate Security Guard Frank Wills found the second taped door and called the police for help. (19)
Jim Hougan has also questioned the reason why Shoffler volunteered for a second shift. This meant two eight-hour shifts back-to-back. The following day was Shoffler's birthday. His wife and children had gone to Pennsylvania on the afternoon of 16 June to spend the weekend at Shoffler's parents' home. Shoffler was to join them that weekend to celebrate his birthday with his parents. Given the long journey in front of him, it seems odd that he chose to work a second shift on that particular night."
Hougan adds: "Adding to the suspicious surrounding Shoffler is the fact that he is no ordinary cop. Prior to joining the police department in Washington, he had served for years in the Vint Hill Farm Station in Virginia. This is one of the NSA's most important domestic "listening posts." Staffed by personnel assigned to the Army Security Agency (ASA), Vint Hill Farm is thought to be responsible for making intercepting communications traffic emanating from Washington's Embassy Row. By itself, this proves nothing, but it is ironic that the police officer responsible for making the most important IOC (Interception of Communications) bust in American history should himself have worked in the same area only a few years earlier. (20)
Captain Edmund Chung was Shoffler's commanding officer at Vint Hill Farm Station in Virginia. Chung claims that he had dinner several months after the Watergate break-in. According to Chung, Shoffler told him that the arrests were the result of a tip-off and that he had been in contact with Alfred Baldwin prior to the break-in. Shoffler added that if he ever made the whole story public, "his life wouldn't be worth a nickel". Shoffler later denied the story and suggested that Chung was a CIA agent. (21)
Jim Hougan claims that it is unclear if it was Carl M. Shoffler who tipped off Bob Woodward to be in court to see the Watergate burglars when they first appeared in court for their arraignment on Saturday, June 17, 1972, just hours after their early-morning arrest. It may be more than a chain of coincidences, though Shoffler himself, admitted, considering the information available, said: "If I was a jury, I'd convict me." (22)
Woodward later wrote about his attendance at the courtroom. "One person stood out. In a middle row sat a young man with fashionably long hair and an expensive suit with slightly flared lapels, his chin high, his eyes searching the room as if he were in unfamiliar surroundings." Woodward sat down next to him and asked if he was in court because of the Watergate arrests. "Perhaps," the man said. "I'm not the attorney of record. I'm acting as an individual." He then said his name was Douglas Caddy. (23)
Caddy later recalled: "As the five were being arraigned in court late that Saturday, a Washington Post reporter named Bob Woodward, himself a former military intelligence agent assigned to the Nixon White House, sought me out. I found myself in the awkward position of providing evasive answers, because at that point few persons knew of the involvement of Hunt and Liddy, and anything I might say could place them in legal jeopardy." (24)
During the court hearing James McCord was asked by the judge about his current employment. He replied that he was a security consultant and then went on to say he had previously worked for the CIA. As soon as Woodward heard this, he knew he had an interesting news story. Why had McCord revealed his association with the CIA? Is it possible that Woodward had been told by someone in the CIA that he was going to give that information that morning? (25)
Woodward returned to the office with news of McCord's statement. The city editor, Barry Sussman, decided that the story should appear on the front page of the newspaper. The first paragraph of the story read: "Five men, one of whom said he is a former employee of the Central Intelligence Agency, were arrested at 2.30 a.m. yesterday in what authorities described as an elaborate plot to bug the offices of the Democratic National Committee here." (26)
The phone number of E. Howard Hunt was found in address books of Bernard L. Barker. Hunt, a former senior figure in the CIA who at the time was working at the time as a consultant to Charles Colson, special counsel to President Richard Nixon. Hunt records in his autobiography, American Spy: My Secret History in the Cia, Watergate and Beyond (2007) that he received a telephone-call from Bob Woodward who asked him. "Some men have been arrested, and one of them had your name in his notebook. His name is Barker. Is he a friend of yours?" Hunt admitted that he replied without thinking: "Oh my God." (27)
As Douglas Caddy was Hunt's lawyer, the authorities wanted to know if he had any information on the Watergate break-in: "While I was in the federal courthouse working on the case on June 28, Assistant U.S. Attorney Donald Campbell approached me and handed me a subpoena to appear "forthwith" before the federal grand jury that had been convened to investigate the case. Campbell then grabbed me by the arm and physically pulled me into the grand jury room. Principal Assistant U.S. Attorney Earl Silbert immediately began asking me questions and demanding answers as the grand jurors looked on… I answered hundreds of questions and even had my bank account subpoenaed by the prosecutors, but I refused to answer 38 key questions that had been publicized by the prosecution and which attempted, through my lips as their defense attorney, to implicate and incriminate Hunt and Liddy." (28)
The Washington Post reported on the links between Caddy and Hunt: "During the extraordinary court proceeding yesterday, it was revealed that the attorney, Douglas Caddy, has been questioned at least twice about the possible involvement of the Central Intelligence Agency in the case. And Caddy was ordered to testify before a federal grand jury about his relationship with Howard Hunt, the one-time White House consultant. Caddy's attorney did disclose to the court that Caddy has been before the grand jury three times for a total of about 14 hours and answered all but roughly 10 per cent of about 14 hours of the 300 to 400 questions asked him. (29)
One of the questions that Judge John J. Sirica wanted answering concerned how Douglas Caddy was appointed as the Watergate burglar's attorney. It was pointed out that at around 9:30 a.m. Caddy appeared at police headquarters to represent the arrested men, who had made no telephone calls. Sirica wanted to know who told Caddy that the men had been arrested. (30)
President Richard Nixon became interested in Caddy and asked John Ehrlichman about his role in the break-in. Ehrlichman replied: "He (Caddy) represented the five guys who got caught the night they were caught, and he was at the police station within minutes after the police brought the prisoners there. He'd obviously been called by someone from the outside. Well, I think what had happened is that Hunt was in the neighborhood, and when he saw those guys get caught or heard it over the bug, he called Caddy and Caddy went down and tried to arrange bail and advised them not to talk and so forth." Ehrlichman added that Caddy was a Republican who had been very active in the "very conservative Young Americans for Freedom." (31)
Caddy later explained. "I strongly believed that my answering the 38 questions would violate the attorney-client privilege. For example, two questions asked were: ‘At what time did you receive a telephone call in the early morning hours of Saturday, June 17, 1972?' and ‘From whom did you receive a telephone call in the early morning hours of June 17, 1972?' Obviously if I answered these and the remaining 36 questions Hunt and Liddy would inevitably have been implicated in the break-in, although they had not been arrested. "(32)
Judge Sirica found Caddy in contempt of court and was placed in custody of the U.S. Marshal. After spending a short time in the cell block directly behind the courtroom, he was taken down the elevator to the basement and placed behind bars in the central cell block imprisoning people awaiting their various trials. As the New York Times reported: "Late this afternoon, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit stayed the penalty pending a hearing… Mr Caddy was then released without bond." (33)
Hush Money and the Watergate Trial
Two weeks after the Watergate arrests Douglas Caddy began receiving phone-calls from a man who called himself Mr. Rivers. The purpose of the calls was the request for Caddy to pay "hush money" to Hunt, Liddy and the five arrested burglars. On 6 July 1972, Caddy told Rivers he was unwilling to carry out the task and did not want him to contact him again. Caddy later found out that Rivers was Anthony Ulasewicz, a former New York City detective who carried out numerous assignments for the White House. (34)
On 20 July, Hunt began to threaten the White House with public disclosure of his other secret activities in the Special Investigative Unit unless he was paid off. According to Hunt's biographer, Tad Szulc, he sent a message, saying "the writer has a manuscript of a play to sell," via Douglas Caddy, to be passed on to the White House. Caddy gave this message to Paul O'Brien, an attorney for the Committee to Re-Elect, who in turn, passed it on to John Dean. (35)
In October 1972, James W. McCord got a call from his attorney, Gerald Alch, who wanted to arrange a meeting about the case. According to McCord, Alch's opening words were, "I have just come from Bittman's office (Howard Hunt's attorney William Bittman). Nobody gets up on that (witness) stand during the trial. In return, they will get executive clemency, money while in prison and rehabilitation afterwards." McCord refused the deal. "I went over my concerns that the whole business had the appearance of a control mechanism to keep the men quiet prior to the Nixon election by the use of money as a weapon and tool." (36)
The objective of paying "hush money" was to ensure that the men pleaded guilty and did not give evidence against the men who arranged for the Watergate break-in to take place. However, McCord was not willing to take the money from this source because he did not want to help Richard Nixon to win the 1972 Presidential Election. This reinforces the idea that McCord wanted the Watergate break-in to fail and the main objective was to bring down Nixon. This was the view of H. R. Halderman, Nixon's Chief of Staff, who wrote in The Ends of Power (1978) that the Watergate operation made no sense: "Nixon didn't need any political information, useful or otherwise, to defeat McGovern. He was about 64-36 in the polls, an unprecedented lead." Haldeman was convinced that McCord wanted to be arrested and that he was in the pay of either the Democratic Party or the CIA. (37)
Negotiations continued with James McCord. John Dean promised McCord an eventual government job and his family's financial security. McCord proposed that the trial could be dismissed if prosecutors introduced telephone conversations regarding Watergate that he had made to the Israeli and Chilean embassies - both of which were illegally wiretapped. Dean rejected this strategy. (38)
One of the reasons that McCord might have been unwilling to take John Dean's money was that he might have been well rewarded by the CIA to get Nixon to resign. When he was arrested, McCord met Garey Bittenbender in the police station. Bittenbender was the police officer who served as McCord's liaison between the CRP and the police Intelligence Division. They had a brief conversation and McCord told Bittenbender that the Watergate break-in was "a CIA operation". (39)
Soon after the Watergate break-in James McCord destroyed a large number of documents that he kept in his home safe. Also present during the fire was Lee R. Pennington. At the time Pennington was director of the Washington office of the ultraconservative American Security Council. He was also, and had been for more than fifteen years, a contract agent of the CIA Security Research Staff. Pennington said that he helped McCord destroy every shred of paper that was found in McCord's office. (40)
The director of the CIA, Richard Helms, also decided to erase all tapes and burn all transcripts of conversations secretly recorded on what has been described as the CIA's "central recording system". More than four thousand pages of recorded conversations were destroyed, obliterating the behind-the-scenes record of Helms's six and a half years as DCI. Senator Mike Mansfield had ordered that all materials having to do with the Watergate affair be preserved, pending the Senate's scheduled hearings on the subject. Helms insisted that none of them had anything to do with the Watergate affair. "Who in the public can make an allegation that there were any tapes that were Watergate-related?" Lucien Nedzi replied: "The problem is, if the shoe was put on the other foot, how can you prove they weren't Watergate-related?" (41)
If McCord was unwilling to take the money, Hunt and the other burglars were willing to be rewarded for their silence. Rivers (Ulasewicz) had also been in contact with William Bittman, the lawyer who had agreed to represent Howard E. Hunt and supplied him with $25,000 for his legal costs. Rivers had not contacted Hunt directly because he assumed his telephone had been tapped by the FBI. Rivers eventually contacted Hunt's wife, Dorothy Hunt, via a phone booth in Potomac Village, and she was asked for an estimate of each arrested man's monthly living expenses and attorneys' fees, including those of Hunt and Liddy. The following day, she gave the amount to Rivers, who replied, "Well, let's multiply that by five to cut down on the number of deliveries." (42)
John Dean was giving the job of arranging the payment of "hush money". This money was given to Dorothy Hunt. (43) According to Tad Szulc, Hunt's biographer, Hunt collected over $200,000 from the White House over a short period of time. (44)
In his book, The President's Private Eye (1990), Anthony Ulasewicz, admitted that he had was the man supplying the money to Dorothy Hunt. "She (Dorothy Hunt) started calculating everybody's needs and came up with a minimum figure of $3,000 a month, but as she didn't want to worry about a monthly delivery from the post man, it was better, she said, to get a big chunk up front to relieve the pressure on everybody. ‘So let's start with $10,000 or $15,000 apiece to get this thing off the ground,' she said. She wanted the advance to cover five months of living expenses. She said Barker, Sturgis, Gonzales, and Martinez needed at least $14,000 apiece and that Barker needed another $10,000 for bail, $10,000 more under the table, and $3,000 for ‘other expenses.' Twenty-five grand apiece were needed for Sturgis, Gonzales, and Martinez's attorneys. I told Mrs. Hunt to slow down. Now she was talking about $400,000 or maybe $450,000. That wasn't even close to the amount Dean had told Kalmbach to raise when they met in Lafayette Park."
Ulasewicz claims he delivered a total of "$154,000 to Dorothy Hunt in four separate instalments: $40,000, $43,000, $18,000 and $53,000. She was never satisfied with the amount of money I gave her. She never believed that I didn't have (and didn't want) the power to determine the breadth of financial support she said was necessary to keep things afloat. Neither Kalmbach nor I knew whether she was delivering what those involved were supposed to receive. She kept telling me about Barker's problems down south; that he needed a lot of cash to keep the lid on things in Miami." (45)
On 8th December 1972, Dorothy Hunt had a meeting with Michelle Clark, a journalist working for CBS. Was she about to betray Nixon and the others involved in the cover-up? According to Sherman Skolnick, Clark was working on a story on the Watergate case: "Ms Clark had lots of insight into the bugging and cover-up through her boyfriend, a CIA operative. In the summer of 1972, prior to any major revelations of Watergate, Ms Clark tried to pick the brains of Chicago Congressman George Collins, regarding the bugging of the Democratic headquarters. (46)
Dorothy Hunt, Michelle Clark and George Collins took the Flight 533 from Washington to Chicago. The aircraft hit the branches of trees close to Midway Airport: "It then hit the roofs of a number of neighborhood bungalows before plowing into the home of Mrs. Veronica Kuculich at 3722 70th Place, demolishing the home and killing her and a daughter, Theresa. The plane burst into flames killing a total of 45 persons, 43 of them on the plane, including the pilot and first and second officers. Eighteen passengers survived." Hunt, Clark and Collins were all killed in the accident. (47)
Just before Dorothy Hunt boarded the aircraft, she purchased $250,000 in flight insurance payable to E. Howard Hunt from an airport vending machine. In his book American Spy (2007) Hunt claims he was unaware that his wife planned to do this. In the book he also tried to explain what his wife was doing with $10,000 in her purse. According to Hunt it was money to be invested with Hal Carlstead in "two already-built Holiday Inns in the Chicago area". (48)
H. R. Halderman, who was fully aware of the negotiations taking place between Hunt and Dean found this account difficult to believe. "Howard Hunt, supposedly so desperate for $122,000 he would threaten the White House with blackmail, should have been floating in money. He not only had had received thousands of dollars from Kalmbach and LaRue, but his wife had been tragically killed in an aeroplane crash, and the insurance Hunt collected was substantial. Mrs Hunt was carrying thousands of dollars in cash when her plane crashed enroute to Chicago. She was the paymaster for the burglars. But the burglars were in Washington and Miami. Why was she taking the money to Chicago? Hunt reportedly said he intended to lavish the cash in a real estate venture in Illinois. If he had enough money for real estate speculation, why was he so desperate for funds as we were led to believe?" (49)
As Peter Dale Scott has pointed out: "Of the more than a dozen suspicious deaths in the case of Watergate... perhaps the most significant death was that of Dorothy Hunt in the crash of United Air Lines in December 1972. The crash was investigated for possible sabotage by both the FBI and a congressional committee, but sabotage was never proven. Nevertheless, some people assumed that Dorothy Hunt was murdered (along with the dozens of others in the plane)." Howard Hunt saw his wife death as a warning and dropped all further demands on the White House and agreed to plead guilty to the Watergate burglary in January 1973. (50)
Negotiations were also carried out directly with James McCord. Dean promised McCord an eventual government job and his family's financial security. McCord proposed that the trial could be dismissed if prosecutors introduced telephone conversations regarding Watergate that he had made to the Israeli and Chilean embassies - both of which were illegally wiretapped. Dean rejected this strategy. (51)
Daniel Schultz who represented Frank Sturgis, Virgilio Gonzalez, Eugenio Martinez, and Bernard L. Barker claimed at their trial that they believed they were involved in a legitimate national security operation rather than in a crime, saying that his clients were "men convicted of a crime who are not criminals." Sturgis, Gonzalez, Martinez, Barker and Hunt all pleaded guilty and received the following sentences: Sturgis (1 to 4 years in prison); Gonzalez (1 to 4 years in prison); Martinez (1 to 4 years in prison); Barker: (18 months to 6 years in prison); Hunt (2½ years to 8 years in prison and fined $10,000). (52)
Seymour Hersh wrote an article in the New York Times claiming that all these men were receiving hush money and were pressured to plead guilty. Hersh speculated that the money came from the Committee for the Re-election of the President. Officials of the organisation "had acknowledged privately that they are unable to account for $900,000 in cash raised for President Nixon's 1972 campaign - far more than the $235,000 mentioned in court as the cost of the activities of the Watergate group." (53)
On 19 March 1973 James W. McCord sent a letter to Judge John J. Sirica where he argued: "Several members of my family have expressed fear for my life if I disclose knowledge of the facts in this matter, either publicly or to any government representative. Whereas I do not share their concerns to the same degree, nevertheless, I do believe that retaliatory measures will be taken against me, my family, and my friends should I disclose such facts." However, he was willing to state that: "(i) There was political pressure applied to the defendants to plead guilty and remain silent. (ii) Perjury occurred during the trial in matters highly material to the very structure, orientation, and impact of the government's case, and to the motivation and intent of the defendants. (iii) Others involved in the Watergate operation were not identified during the trial, when they could have been by those testifying." (54)
James McCord's sentencing was postponed until June and then postponed again. Finally, in November 1973, McCord was sentenced to one to five years and began serving his sentence in March 1975 but was released after only four months because of his cooperation in the Watergate investigation. (55)
Douglas Caddy had been wise not to have got involved in distributing "hush money". From what he learnt since he has a theory about the Watergate operation. "The CIA, which had successfully positioned Hunt inside White House, had prior knowledge of the planned break-in. Once the arrest of the burglars occurred, the CIA turned its attention to manipulating the cover-up using Hunt to mount the campaign to get ‘hush' money. I believe the CIA was behind the break-in and assigned Hunt to influence Gordon Liddy to mount it. Its aim was to install a wiretap. The CIA's purpose was to bring down the Nixon presidency because of the threat to it of the Huston Plan and of Nixon's encroachment on the most important intelligence concern of the CIA." (56)
Koreagate
In 1964 Douglas Caddy agreed to serve as a board member of the International Youth Federation of Freedom (IYFF) that had been established by Tongsun Park, someone he first met when they were students at Georgetown University‘s School of Foreign Service. Caddy later recalled it was basically a paper organization. "It was essentially dormant during its entire existence although the manager's office of the exclusive George Town Club in Washington that Tongsun owned also served as IYFF's office. The George Town Club's membership comprised the elite of Washington who flocked to the exclusive dining facility not only for its superb menu but for being able to mingle with senators and congressman who comprised the bulk of the membership." (57)

In 1976, Tongsun Park was charged with bribing members of the U.S. Congress, using money from the South Korean government, in a successful effort to convince the United States government to keep U.S. troops in South Korea. The scandal involved the uncovering of evidence that the Korea Central Intelligence Agency (KCIA) was allegedly funnelling bribes and favours through Park in an attempt to gain favour and influence in American politics. (58)
Caddy became involved in the scandal when Maxine Cheshire of the The Washington Post published an article on him by reporter Maxine Cheshire that attempted to implicate him in the corrupt activities of Tongsun Park. Cheshire implied that Caddy was a central figure in the scandal. (59) Caddy was questioned by staff members of the US House of Representatives ethics committee about his relationship with Park, but never testified publicly. (60)
Caddy was never charged with any offence but following the publication of a report detailing the scandal, two members of Congress were charged with crimes: Representative Richard T. Hanna of California and Representative Otto Passman of Louisiana. Passman was acquitted after a trial. Hanna pleaded guilty to 40 counts of conspiracy, bribery, receiving illegal gratuities, mail fraud and failing to register as a foreign agent and was sentenced to 6–30 months in federal prison." (61)
The Moody Foundation Scandal
In 1979 Douglas Caddy moved to Houston, Texas and was admitted to the Texas Bar to practice law that same year. In 1980 George Strake Jr., who was the Texas Secretary of State under Governor William Clements, asked him to join his staff as Director of Elections for the State of Texas. In 1981 he became legal counsel to the Texas Policy Institute, which was about to receive a $250,000 grant from the Moody Foundation of Galveston, Texas. In 1982 Caddy began work with Shearn Moody, Jr., on several other Moody Foundation grants. (62)
Moody had long served on the board of the charitable foundation, helping to direct millions of dollars in grants to just causes. However, the Internal Revenue Service accused him of making millions of dollars of grants to himself and therefore owing more than $14 million in taxes and penalties. According to an article in The Houston Post , it was Caddy who prompted investigations into Shearn Moody. As a result, he received bomb threats, been followed, had his phones tapped and the windows of his office shot out in the night. "Yet Douglas Caddy still feared he might just be paranoid…. His fears, apparently, were not unfounded. In a sworn statement submitted to a Houston private investigator and the FBI, a former military explosives expert says Caddy was the target of an alleged bomb plot hatched by Galveston millionaire Shearn Moody. The expert claimed that Moody tried to hire him to "blow (Caddy's) legs off" because Caddy prompted investigations into impropriety within the multimillion-dollar Moody Foundation." (63)
In December 1987, Shearn Moody Jr. was convicted of defrauding his family's charitable foundation of nearly $1.5 million and faced up to 85 years in prison. The New York Times reported that "Mr. Moody, ousted earlier this year as a Moody Foundation trustee, could also be fined as much as $4.5 million when he is sentenced." (64) He was sentenced to five years in federal prison and was released on parole in May 1991. (65)
Billie Sol Estes
Douglas Caddy first became involved with Billie Sol Estes when he was working for Shearn Moody, Jr.. In 1983, Jimmy Day, who was in the federal prison in Big Spring, Texas, contacted Moody to say that a fellow inmate, Billie Sol Estes, wanted to tell all he knew about his close criminal relationship over many decades with President Lyndon B. Johnson, who had died ten years earlier in 1973. Shean asked Caddy to visit Billie Sol Estes in prison.
A few weeks later Caddy visited Billie Sol Estes in prison. Caddy was told that he had a story to tell about Johnson that "would rock the world". Caddy suggested he should write a book about it and in January 1984, after he was released from prison, Billie Sol Estes asked if it was possible to write it under a Moody Foundation Grant. Shearn agreed to give him $100,000. (66)
In March 1984, Billie Sol Estes appeared before a grand jury in Robertson County and testified that Lyndon Johnson was behind the 1961 murder of U.S. Department of Agriculture official Henry Marshall. The Dallas Morning News reported: "Convicted swindler Billie Sol Estes told a grand jury that Lyndon B. Johnson was one of four men who planned the 1961 murder of an agricultural official… The sources said Estes testified that the group feared the official would link Estes' illegal activities to the vice president. Estes, who testified before the Robertson County Grand Jury on Tuesday, told grand jurors that Johnson felt pressure to silence Henry Harvey Marshall of Bryan, a regional USDA official in charge of federal allotment programme, sources said." (67)
Before he started his book Billie Sol Estes asked Caddy to obtain for him immunity from prosecution from the U.S. Department of Justice. Caddy received a reply from Stephen S. Trott at the US Department of Justice. He asked for evidence about the claims made by Estes: "I must make sure that several things are understood at this time concerning Mr Estes' proffered cooperation. First, if after reviewing your offer of proof we decide the information that Mr. Estes can provide is credible and in all other respects warrants further investigation – a decision which will be made unilaterally by the government – it will be necessary for Mr. Estes to be interviewed and to reveal everything he knows about the possible criminal violations. He will have to do so completely, truthfully and without guile." (68)
On receipt Trott's letter Caddy conferred with Estes who provided him with the information that Trott required. Caddy then replied to Trott's letter on 9 August 1984, and it included claims that Lyndon B. Johnson, Malcolm (Mac) Wallace and Cliff Carter were involved in the deaths of John Kinser, Harold Orr, Coleman Wade, Josefa Johnson.and John F. Kennedy: "Mr. Estes was a member of a four-member group, headed by Lyndon Johnson, which committed criminal acts in Texas in the 1960's. The other two, besides Mr. Estes and LBJ, were Cliff Carter and Mac Wallace. Mr. Estes is willing to disclose his knowledge concerning the following criminal offenses: (i) The killing of Henry Marshall; (ii) The killing of George Krutilek; (iii) The killing of Ike Rogers and his secretary; (iv) The killing of Harold Orr; (v) The killing of Coleman Wade; (vi) The killing of Josefa Johnson; (vii) The killing of John Kinser; (viii) The killing of President J. F. Kennedy."
The letter went onto say that: "Mr. Estes is willing to testify that LBJ ordered these killings, and that he transmitted his orders through Cliff Carter to Mac Wallace, who executed the murders. In the cases of murders nos. 1-7, Mr. Estes' knowledge of the precise details concerning the way the murders were executed stems from conversations he had shortly after each event with Cliff Carter and Mac Wallace." (69)
Billy Sol Estes was not the first person to claim that Lyndon Johnson could order the killings of people who were causing him problems. J. Evetts Haley makes this point in A Texan Looks at Lyndon (1964). Haley writes in some detail about the corrupt relationship between Johnson and Estes. He claims that between 1958 and 1960 Estes ran a vast scam getting federal agricultural subsidies. According to Estes he obtained $21 million a year for "growing" and "storing" non-existent crops of cotton. It was this scam that Henry Marshall, was investigating when he died in 1960. Haley pointed out that three men who could have provided evidence in court against Estes, George Krutilek, Harold Orr and Howard Pratt, all died of carbon monoxide poisoning from car engines. (70)
Haley argued in his book that Malcolm (Mac) Wallace was used by Johnson to kill these characters. It was not only Haley who believed that Wallace was involved in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. According to Barr McClelellan, a lawyer who worked for Johnson, in 1970 Wallace returned to Dallas and began pressing Edward A. Clark for more money for his part in the assassination. It was then decided to kill Wallace. "He had to be eliminated. After driving to see his daughter in Troup, Texas, he went by L & G's offices in Longview, Texas. There his exhaust was rigged for part of it to flow into his car." On 7 January 1971, Malcolm Wallace was killed while driving into Pittsburg, Texas. He appeared to have fallen asleep and after leaving the road crashed his car. Wallace died of massive head injuries. (71)
One person who believed Haley's view that Henry Marshall was murdered was Clinton Peoples, the Texas Ranger who originally investigated the death of Marshall. He was convinced that he had been murdered although the official verdict was suicide. After his retirement from the Texas Rangers, he continued to investigate the death of Marshall. In 1979 he interviewed Billy Sol Estes in prison. Estes promised that "when he was released, he would solve the puzzle of Henry Marshall's death". (72)
Assistant Attorney General Trott and FBI agents examined the agency file on Billie Sol Estes to determine if the pursuit of granting immunity to him was warranted. They concluded it was and Caddy and three FBI agents flew from Washington to Abilene to meet with Billie Sol Estes to hear what he had to say. At the last moment Estes withdrew from negotiations to gain immunity. He was adamant about this, so the three agents departed and flew back to Washington. (73)
Billie Sol Estes explained his decision in his autobiography: "After a further series of letters, a meeting was set up at a hotel in Abilene. As the day approached, I received a series of telephone calls from my Italian friends. I was informed my discussions with the Justice Department was a mistake. They insisted that if I appeared to be going through with the discussions, my life would end. I do not know how they found out about the discussions, my life would end. I do not know how they found out about the discussions. Now I may be dumb, but I am not stupid and I do not have a death wish." (74)
Clint Peoples continued with his investigation into the relationship between Malcolm Wallace and Lyndon Johnson. According to Phillip F. Nelson, LBJ: The Mastermind of JFK's Assassination (2010): "After working on his own time for many years to break the Wallace murders open, and tie him directly into the Kennedy assassination as well, as he was about to announce his findings, his car was broadsided by a large truck, immediately killing him… Captain Peoples knew too much and was still a threat to certain people and institutions as late as 1992." (75)
Clint Peoples' assistant, a woman named "Georgia" (she was scared of publicity and refused to allow her name to be revealed) decided to cooperate with French researcher William Reymond for his 2003 French book on Billie Sol Estes. She stated that when she went to the funeral home for the viewing, a woman came up to her and told her not to tell anyone else, but that she had witnessed the entire incident; she said it was no "accident," because Clint's car was pushed off the road from behind by a "big red truck" and the weather was clear, the road was dry. The driver of the truck did it intentionally, she said, and then left the scene. (76)
Robert Merritt
In May 2008, Robert Merritt contacted Douglas Caddy by telephone to ask him if he would help him write a book about what he knew about Watergate. Caddy agreed to do so but they never met as he lived in Houston and Merritt lived in New York City. The book, Watergate Exposed: How the President of the United States and the Watergate Burglars Were Set-Up was published in 2010. (77)

Merritt became a member of Metropolitan Police Department in 1969. Soon afterwards he developed a close relationship with Detective Carl M. Shoffler of the MPD Intelligence Division, who recruited him as a "Confidential Informant". Merritt later recalled "From the spring of 1970 until October 1971 I worked for Carl and for the MPD Intelligence Division… In October 1971… Carl arranged for me to be transferred to the Washington, D. C. field office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. I was delegated to work with Special Agents Terry O'Connor and Bill Tucker. The FBI assignment primarily dealt with targeting the Institute for Policy Studies and the Weatherman Underground, two organisations deemed radical and dangerous under the government's COINTELPRO program, although no organization in the country was immune from investigation… Instructions included engaging in multiple criminal acts, such as planting drugs (they gave me about 500 ‘dime' bags of pot valued at $10 each and 5 or more ounces of cocaine) to clandestinely place upon unsuspecting protesters against the Vietnam War or radical political foes of the Nixon White House, bugging, instigating violence at demonstrations by throwing the first rocks at the police, cutting wires to sound equipment at left-wing public events and protests, giving misinformation to protestors, spreading lies and rumours, creating racial friction, causing thousands of protestors to be arrested, engaging in theft, burglary, mail fraud, filing false police reports against individuals, and many other crimes against citizens who were merely exercising their First Amendment rights." (78)
Robert Merrit also had his own informants, one of whom tipped him off on 1 June 1972, of the burglars' plan to break into the Democratic National Committee two weeks later. Merritt passed this information to Carl Shoffler who set up an entrapment scheme. His plan was to become the most famous detective in the world. Shoffler arrested the burglars inside the Watergate building on 17 June 1972, shortly after midnight. (79)
According to Merritt: "Shoffler came to my apartment in Washington, DC, late in the morning of the day of the events at Watergate and exulted in having made the arrests. He told me that he had had secretly telephoned the Washington Post soon after the arrests to tip the newspaper off to what had occurred… Shoffler said, ‘The intention of the Watergate break-in was to destroy the Nixon presidency. President Nixon was guilty of nothing in its planning'. Shoffler said that there were hidden motivations involved, such as the fear of law enforcement agencies that their turf would be reduced by President Nixon through a scheme known as the Huston Plan, the CIA's concern that President Nixon planned to reorganize the intelligence agencies and their operations, and the Defense Department's opposition to President Nixon's new China policy." (80)
Merritt, who was bi-sexual, claimed that Shoffler approached him and told him to establish a homosexual relationship with Caddy, stating falsely that Caddy was gay and a supporter of Communist causes. In fact, Caddy had a long record of being a right-wing activist being the National Director of the Young Americans for Freedom. (81)

Merritt recalled that on 20 June 1972, "Shoffler showed up at my apartment with his supervisor, Police Sergeant. Paul Leeper. They asked me if I knew someone by the name of Douglas Caddy, who lived at the Georgetown House, a high-rise apartment, at 2121 P St., N.W. which was directly across the street from my apartment. They wanted me to establish a sexual relationship with Douglas Caddy knew to show up for the arraignment of the burglars after the arrest. They asserted that Douglas Caddy had to be in on the conspiracy with the burglars and that in the past he had been shadowed when he frequented a leather-Levi gay bar in Greenwich Village in Manhattan… They told me that this was the most important thing that I could do for my country and that I would be well-paid if I undertook the assignment. Their initial offer was $10,000. I did not commit to doing the assignment." (82)
Merritt eventually told Shoffler that he was unwilling to carry out the assignment. In March 1973, nine months after the initial overture and a month after the first Watergate trial ended, Merritt met with Shoffler, Paul Leeper, and two FBI agents, Terry O'Connor and William T. Tucker. Once again, they attempted to persuade him to take the Caddy assignment, this time offering an initial $25,000. When he refused Leeper said that he could be paid as much as $100,000 if he took the assignment. According to his own testimony, Merritt again refused. (83)
In recent years Douglas Caddy has moved to the left. He describes himself as a "progressive-liberal" who supported Al Gore for President in 2000 and Howard Dean for President in 2004 and belongs to People for the American Way (ACLU). He believes that the Conservative Movement, which he helped found in late 1950s, is now controlled by sociopaths and opportunists who pose a dire threat to our democracy. (84)
Primary Sources
(1) Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, All the President's Men (1974)
Woodward went inside the courtroom. One person stood out. In a middle row sat a young man with fashionably long hair and an expensive suit with slightly flared lapels, his chin high, his eyes searching the room as if he were in unfamiliar surroundings.
Woodward sat down next to him and asked if he was in court because of the Watergate arrests.
"Perhaps," the man said. "I'm not the attorney of record. I'm acting as an individual."
He said his name was Douglas Caddy and he introduced a small, "anemic-looking man next to him as the attorney of record, Joseph Rafferty, Jr. Rafferty appeared to have been routed out of bed; he was unshaven and squinted as if the light hurt his eyes. The two lawyers wandered in and out of the courtroom. Woodward finally cornered Rafferty in a hallway and got the names and addresses of the five suspects. Four of them were from Miami, three of them Cuban-Americans.
Caddy didn't want to talk. "Please don't take it personally," he told Woodward. "It would be a mistake to do that. I just don't have anything to say."
Woodward asked Caddy about his clients.
"They are not my clients," he said.
But you are a lawyer? Woodward asked. "I'm not going to talk to you."
Caddy walked back into the courtroom. Woodward followed. "Please, I have nothing to say." Would the five men be able to post bond? Woodward asked. After politely refusing to answer several more times, Caddy replied quickly that the men were all employed and had families-factors that\would be taken into consideration by the judge in setting bond. He walked back into the corridor.
Woodward followed: Just tell me about yourself, how you got into the case.
"I'm not in the case." Why are you here?
"Look," Caddy said, "I met one of the defendants, Bernard Barker, at a social occasion."
Where?
"In D.C. It was cocktails at the Army-Navy Club. We had a sympathetic conversation... that's all I'm going to say."
How did you get into the case?
Caddy pivoted and walked back in. After half an hour, he went out again.
Woodward asked how he got into the case.
This time Caddy said he'd gotten a call shortly after 3:00 A.M. from Barker's wife. "She said her husband had told her to call me if he hadn't called her by three, that it might mean he was in trouble."
(2) Douglas Caddy, Did Gay Bashing by the Prosecutors Cause the Watergate cover-up? (1st August, 2005)
Watergate, said Sen. Sam Ervin at the time, was the most publicized event in American political history. Certainly it was our country’s biggest criminal case of the 20th century. For as long as the American republic exists, there will be lingering questions about it.
Most of what you are about to read has never been discussed by the media and is not mentioned in any of the official government investigations into the scandal, such as the Senate Watergate Committee Report, the House Judiciary Committee Report on the Impeachment of President Nixon or any of the special prosecutor’s reports.
Indeed, it is safe to say that some in the judiciary and in the U.S. Department of Justice hoped it would never see the light of day. For those who have learned of it are left invariably asking themselves: Did the conduct of Chief Judge John Sirica in the early days of the case cause the seven Watergate defendants to engage in a cover-up?
Beginning with Hunt’s phone call, I served as the attorney for the seven defendants - Hunt, Gordon Liddy, James McCord, and the four Cuban-Americans. Subsequently, as the result of my being the first witness pulled before the Watergate grand jury, my role was changed--from attorney for the defense to witness for the prosecution.
I became involved as the original defense attorney because I had prior professional relationships with two of the principals: Hunt and Liddy.
(3) E. Howard Hunt, Undercover: Memoirs of an American Secret Agent (1974)
From there I drove to the White House annex - the old Executive Office Building, in bygone years the War Department and later the Department of State.
Carrying three heavy attaché cases, I entered the Pennsylvania Avenue door, showed my blue-and-white White House pass to the uniformed guards, and took the elevator to the third floor. I unlocked the door of 338 and went in. I opened my two-drawer safe, took out my operational handbook, found a telephone number and dialed it.
The time was 3:13 in the morning of June 17, 1972, and the five of my companions had been arrested and taken to the maximum-security block of the District of Columbia jail. I had recruited four of them and it was my responsibility to get them out. That was the sole focus of my thoughts as I began talking on the telephone.
But with those five arrests the Watergate affair had begun…
After several rings the call was answered and I heard the sleepy voice of Douglas Caddy. ‘Yes?’
"Doug? This is Howard. I hate to wake you up, but I’ve got a tough situation and I need to talk to you. Can I come over?"
"Sure. I’ll tell the desk clerk you’re expected."
"I’ll be there in about 20 minutes," I told him, and hung up.
From the safe I took a small money box and removed the $10,000 Liddy had given me for emergency use. I put $1,500 in my wallet and the remaining $8,500 in my coat pocket. The black attaché case containing McCord’s electronic equipment I placed in a safe drawer that held my operational notebook. Then I closed and locked the safe, turning the dial several times. The other two cases I left beside the safe, turned out the light and left my office, locking the door.
(4) Jim Hougan, Secret Agenda: Watergate, Deep Throat and the CIA (1984)
After leaving Baldwin at the Howard Johnson's, Hunt had gone to his office in the old Executive Office Building. There he placed some materials in his safe and removed $10,000 in cash to be used for bail and as a legal retainer. He then telephoned Douglas Caddy to ask that Caddy represent the men who were under arrest. While not usually a practitioner of criminal law, Caddy could be trusted so far as Hunt was concerned: he had recently served as the Washington representative of the General Foods corporation, working out of an office at the Mullen Company. As such, he had been standing at an important intersection between the public and private sectors: it was General Foods' account with the Mullen Company that provided cover to CIA officers abroad.' Whether Caddy knew of this, or was himself a CIA "asset," is unknown. The Senate seems never to have questioned him about his work for Mullen or General Foods.
(5) Warren Hinckle & William Turner, Deadly Secrets: The CIA-Mafia War Against Castro and the Assassination of JFK (1992)
The bugs in the DNC offices were being monitored in the Howard Johnson by Alfred Baldwin, an ex-FBI man whose name McCord had picked out of the roster of the Society of Former Special Agents of the FBI. Ordinarily McCord, now employed by the Nixon campaign, would not have accompanied the visitors, but he went along to turn up the volume on his transmitters. The team was busily snapping photos of documents when a security guard noticed tape on door locks and called the police.
Sturgis recalls that he had hardly been booked at the police station when an attorney named Douglas Caddy arrived and told him, "Olympus is watching over you." Sturgis assumed that it was a shibboleth that the fail-safe mechanism was in operation, even though he didn't know that Caddy was close to Howard Hunt and once had had office space in the Mullen agency. But if there was a plan to usher the Miami Four through the judicial turnstile with a minimum of fuss, dismissing them as anti-Castro zealots carried away by the million-dollar rumor, it was spoiled by McCord's name on the police blotter. The press immediately tied him to CREEP.
(6) Bob Woodward, The Washington Post (2nd July, 1972)
A former White House consultant and a lawyer who has represented the five suspects in the bugging attempt at the Democratic National Headquarters were linked yesterday for the first time to grand jury and FBI investigations of the incident.
During an extraordinary court proceeding yesterday, it was revealed that the attorney, Douglas Caddy, has been questioned at least twice about the possible involvement of the Central Intelligence Agency in the case.
And Caddy was ordered to testify before a federal grand jury about his relationship with Howard Hunt, the onetime White House consultant.
In the court proceeding, U.S. District Chief Judge John J. Sirica rejected Caddy’s contentions that he did not have to testify about Hunt before the grand jury because he was Hunt’s attorney.
Accordingly, Caddy was again brought before the grand jury, which is now hearing evidence in the break-in and alleged bugging attempt.
In the court yesterday, Assistant U.S. Attorney Earl J. Silbert told the judge that Caddy was first called by the grand jury on Thursday.
When asked about Hunt, Caddy invoked the attorney-client privilege, refused to testify and then asked to leave the grand jury room and consult with his own attorneys, Silbert said.
Silbert told the judge that the grand jury is investigating for possible federal charges of ‘unlawful interception of wire communications’ and “unlawful possession of wire devices,” as well as for local burglary charges.
He told Sirica that Caddy’s conduct was ‘specious, dilatory and…an obstruction of justice.’
At the end of the hearing, the judge said, ‘I don’t think I’m going to make any exception in the case,’ and ordered Caddy to testify before the grand jury. He said the questions put to Caddy were fair ones.
(7) Bob Woodward, The Washington Post (12th July, 1972)
Government prosecutors have revealed that they are asking questions about a person that they identify only as “Mr. X” in a grand jury investigation of alleged bugging of Democratic Party Headquarters at the Watergate Hotel.
In papers filed in U.S. District Court here, the prosecutors list Mr. X only as a close friend of E. Howard Hunt, Jr., the former Central Intelligence Agency employee and former White House consultant who has been sought for questioning in the case.
According to the court papers, an important witness before the grand jury, attorney M. Douglas Caddy, is refusing to answer questions about Mr. X on the grounds that he is the man’s attorney and that he is therefore protected by a so-called ‘attorney-client privilege.’
Caddy, 34, is a mysterious figure in the Watergate affair. He first appeared at the arraignment of the five defendants on the day they were arrested inside Democratic headquarters.
Since that time, according to the court papers, Caddy has asserted to the grand jury that he represents not only Mr. X but also Hunt, Hunt’s wife, and each of the five arrested defendants.
He has so far refused to answer more than 55 different questions before the grand jury on the grounds that he has an attorney-client privilege with all of those persons, according to the court papers.
The papers were filed by U.S. Attorney Harold M. Titus, Jr. and other prosecutors as part of a motion to compel Caddy to answer questions before the grand jury.
It was the second time the government has moved to have Caddy ordered to testify before the grand jury. On June 30 the government said Caddy had refused to answer whether he knew Hunt and whether he had known Hunt before 1970, at the time when Caddy was admitted to practice here.
At the time, Sirica ordered Caddy to answer According to the court papers Caddy answered those two specific questions about Hunt but then invoked the attorney-client privilege in response to more than 30 other questions asked of him.
(8) Walter Rugaber, The New York Times (14th July, 1972)
A 34-year-old Washington lawyer was found in contempt of court today for refusing to answer a series of grand jury questions about the June 17 raid on the offices of the Democratic National Committee.
The lawyer, Douglas Caddy, spent several hours in the custody of United States marshals rather than reply to 38 inquiries posed by a Federal panel that is investigating the politically sensitive burglary attempt. Late this afternoon, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia stayed the penalty pending a hearing it scheduled for next Tuesday. Mr. Caddy was then released without bond.
He had briefly represented five men arrested during the Democratic break-in and he reportedly represents E. Howard Hunt, Jr., former White House consultant linked to the case, and a seventh man identified only as Mr. X.
The Government brought up Mr. X earlier this week when it asked Chief Judge John J. Sirica of the United States District Court here to order Mr. Caddy to answer the grand jury questions. Mr. Hunt and Mr. X have been described as friends of Mr. Caddy.
In a hearing before Judge Sirica yesterday, Mr. Caddy argued that because he represents Mr. Hunt and Mr. X he cannot be compelled to answer the questions under the attorney-client privilege.
The judge rejected this argument, evidently accepting the Government view that none of the 38 queries touched on the substance of Mr. Caddy’s dealings with the men. When the lawyer persisted in refusing to answer, he was found in civil contempt.
(9) E. Howard Hunt, Undercover: Memoirs of an American Secret Agent (1974)
On the 19th of June, 1972, Gordon Liddy told me that his superiors - the White House - had decided I should leave the country and join my vacationing wife and children in Europe until things settled down in Washington.
I was reluctant to follow such unexpected instructions, feeling I might be regarded as a fugitive even though no warrant had been issued for me (nor ever was). However I went home and began to pack, and soon afterward Liddy phoned me to rescind his previous orders. But shaken by the appearance of confusion and indecision among our sponsors, harassed by the press and lacking even basic legal guidance, I decided to fly to California and quietly await developments.
From there I placed frequent calls to Washington in order to obtain legal counsel. Douglas Caddy, my first--until then only - lawyer, was reluctant to speak with me, as was my employer Robert Bennett. Through press accounts I learned that Caddy had been summoned before a grand jury and then hauled before Judge John J. Sirica who ruled no attorney-client privilege existed between Caddy and myself. He ordered Caddy to answer the grand jury questions and subsequently thrust my attorney in jail.
Sirica’s savage handling of Caddy made me realize how desperately I needed expert legal counsel. Moreover, the cognomen ‘Maximum John’ had begun appearing in the press, and the combined implications were clear: if Sirica was treating Caddy - an Officer of the Court - so summarily, and Caddy was completely uninvolved in Watergate - then those of us who were involved could expect neither fairness nor understanding from him. As events unfolded, this conclusion became tragically accurate.
Among the many legal scholars who were later to criticize Judge Sirica’s conduct of the Watergate proceedings, Dean John Roche of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy had this to say: ‘… there is one sinister relic of that era: Watergate “justice.” one appalling aspect of Watergate was the extent to which liberals and civil libertarians deserted traditional principles of due process. The slogan was: “No due process for the bad guys: get the bastards!” What Sirica did was clearly cruel and unusual punishment forbidden by the Bill of Rights. He used the sentencing process as a medieval rack.’ And Douglas Caddy was his first victim.
(10) Herbert W. Kalmbach gave evidence before the Sam Ervin and the Senate Watergate Committee on 16th July, 1973.
Mr. Dash: Now, what was the first instruction you received to give the money?
Mr. Kalmbach: Again, as I have tried to reconstruct this, Mr. Dash, the first instruction that I received was to have Mr. Ulasewicz give $25,000 to Mr. Caddy. I don’t know much of Mr. Caddy. I understand he is an attorney here in Washington. And, as I recall it, this was probably from approximately July 1 through July 6 or 7. There were a number of phone calls. I would either talk to either Mr. Dean or Mr. LaRue. I would then call Mr. Ulasewicz, who in turn would call Mr. Caddy. He would have some response from Mr. Caddy, and I would call back up to either Mr. Dean or Mr. LaRue.
Mr. Dash: What was the response from Mr. Caddy?
Mr. Kalmbach: Well, the sum and gist of it was that Mr. Caddy refused to accept the funds.
Mr. Dash: In that manner?
Mr. Kalmbach: That is correct. That was the end-all. There were several telephone calls, but the final wrap-up on it was that he refused to receive the funds.
(11) Robert L. Jackson, Los Angeles Times (29th January, 1973)
A clubby atmosphere has prevailed in federal court during the three weeks it has taken the government to present their case in the Watergate bugging trial.
The questioning of Republican officials and others has been more polite than penetrating. Entire areas have been left unprobed.
In corridor discussions, prosecutor Earl Silbert has been asked repeatedly by newsmen why he has not posed additional questions to witnesses or called higher Republican officials to the stand.
Silbert’s contention is that the government is submitting only evidence that is necessary to prove charges in its indictment of the original seven defendants last September.
There is no evidence of a wider conspiracy, he has told reporters. Additional testimony could be immaterial and irrelevant, he has said.
Not only have the prosecution’s questions been limited but the defense attorneys at times have even waived their opportunity to cross-examine.
(12) Douglas Caddy, letter to Stephen S. Trott at the US Department of Justice (9th August, 1984)
Mr. Estes was a member of a four-member group, headed by Lyndon Johnson, which committed criminal acts in Texas in the 1960's. The other two, besides Mr. Estes and LBJ, were Cliff Carter and Mac Wallace. Mr. Estes is willing to disclose his knowledge concerning the following criminal offenses:
I. Murders
1. The killing of Henry Marshall
2. The killing of George Krutilek
3. The killing of Ike Rogers and his secretary
4. The killing of Harold Orr
5. The killing of Coleman Wade
6. The killing of Josefa Johnson
7. The killing of John Kinser
8. The killing of President J. F. Kennedy.
Mr. Estes is willing to testify that LBJ ordered these killings, and that he transmitted his orders through Cliff Carter to Mac Wallace, who executed the murders. In the cases of murders nos. 1-7, Mr. Estes' knowledge of the precise details concerning the way the murders were executed stems from conversations he had shortly after each event with Cliff Carter and Mac Wallace.
In addition, a short time after Mr. Estes was released from prison in 1971, he met with Cliff Carter and they reminisced about what had occurred in the past, including the murders. During their conversation, Carter orally compiled a list of 17 murders which had been committed, some of which Mr. Estes was unfamiliar. A living witness was present at that meeting and should be willing to testify about it. He is Kyle Brown, recently of Houston and now living in Brady, Texas.
Mr. Estes, states that Mac Wallace, whom he describes as a "stone killer" with a communist background, recruited Jack Ruby, who in turn recruited Lee Harvey Oswald. Mr. Estes says that Cliff Carter told him that Mac Wallace fired a shot from the grassy knoll in Dallas, which hit JFK from the front during the assassination.
Mr. Estes declares that Cliff Carter told him the day Kennedy was killed, Fidel Castro also was supposed to be assassinated and that Robert Kennedy, awaiting word of Castro's death, instead received news of his brother's killing.
Mr. Estes says that the Mafia did not participate in the Kennedy assassination but that its participation was discussed prior to the event, but rejected by LBJ, who believed if the Mafia were involved, he would never be out from under its blackmail....
II. The Illegal Cotton Allotments
Mr. Estes desires to discuss the infamous illegal cotton allotment schemes in great detail. He has recordings made at the time of LBJ, Cliff Carter and himself discussing the scheme. These recordings were made with Cliff Carter's knowledge as a means of Carter and Estes protecting them selves should LBJ order their deaths.
Mr. Estes believes these tape recordings and the rumors of other recordings allegedly in his possession are the reason he has not been murdered.
III. Illegal Payoffs
Mr. Estes is willing to disclose illegal payoff schemes, in which he collected and passed on to Cliff Carter and LBJ millions of dollars. Mr. Estes collected payoff money on more than one occasion from George and Herman Brown of Brown and Root, which was delivered to LBJ.
(13) Douglas Caddy, email to John Simkin (18th January, 2006 )
I have been portrayed as a super right-winger when in fact today I am a progressive-liberal who supported Al Gore for President in 2000 and Howard Dean for President in 2004 and belong to People for the American Way, ACLU, and other organizations of similar character. It is true that one time I was pretty conservative, being involved in launching the modern conservative movement in the 1950s and '60s, but I later came to realize that the movement had been hijacked by sociopaths and opportunists. I have not voted for a GOP presidential candidate since 1984.
My political philosophy has always been that the American eagle needs two strong wings to fly. At one time in the 1950s and '60s the eagle was tilted somewhat too much to its left wing. However, at the present time the eagle is dangerously weighted in favor of its right wing, so much so that its very survival as a symbol of liberty and democracy is at risk.
(14) Douglas Caddy, email interview with John Simkin (20th January, 2006 )
John Simkin: I believe in the past you represented Billie Sol Estes. On 9th August, 1984, you wrote to Stephen S. Trott at the U.S. Department of Justice. In the letter you claimed that Billie Sol Estes, Lyndon B. Johnson, Mac Wallace and Cliff Carter had been involved in the murders of Henry Marshall, George Krutilek, Harold Orr, Ike Rogers, Coleman Wade, Josefa Johnson, John Kinser and John F. Kennedy. You added: "Mr. Estes is willing to testify that LBJ ordered these killings, and that he transmitted his orders through Cliff Carter to Mac Wallace, who executed the murders." Did Billie Sol Estes provide you with any evidence that suggested his story was true?
Douglass Caddy: My relationship with Billie Sol Estes began in 1983 when Shearn Moody, a trustee of the Moody Foundation of Galveston, Texas, asked me to visit Billie Sol who was incarcerated in the federal prison at Big Spring, Texas. Billie Sol had telephoned Mr. Moody at the suggestion of a fellow inmate who knew Moody from past days when that inmate had been a lobbyist in the state capital. Billie Sol told Moody that he wanted to tell the story publicly about his long and close relationship with Lyndon Johnson (LBJ) as LBJ's bagman and requested Moody's assistance in getting this done. Moody was happy to oblige.
I met with Billie Sol in prison, who related his desire to tell all. I suggested that he do so in book form and that I would be helpful in any way that I could since I already had two books published.
Moody and I heard nothing more from Billie Sol until soon after his release from prison in early January 1984. At that time he called Moody and Moody again asked me to visit Billie Sol at the latter's home in Abilene, Texas.
There Billie Sol presented me with a copy of the recently released book that his daughter, Pam Estes, had written based on my suggestion to him when he was in prison. Its title was "Billie Sol: King of the Wheeler-Dealers" and it had caused a minor sensation. Based on its limited success, Billie Sol said that he wanted to have his own story published. His daughter's book only told her personal story of the tribulations of the Estes' family in the preceding 20 years.
However, Billie Sol said that before he could tell his full story in book form that he had to get immunity from prosecution by the Texas law authorities and by the U.S. Department of Justice as there is no statute of limitations for murder. A friend of mine, Edward Miller, a former Assistant Director of the FBI, arranged for Miller and myself to meet with Stephen Trott, Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division of the Justice Department, to discuss the question of granting immunity to Billie Sol.
Miller and I met with Trott several times. The Forum has already in its discussions among its members remarked upon the letters exchanged between Trott and myself. In the end the immunity effort came to an abrupt halt when Billie Sol got cold feet at the last moment and backed out of a meeting with three FBI agents sent by Trott to meet with him and myself in Abilene in September 1984.
The contents of the letters between Trott and myself speak for themselves. Billie Sol did not provide me with any evidence that his story, as detailed in the letters, was true. I never heard nor saw the clandestine tape recordings that he claimed that he had in his possession that had been made years earlier, which allegedly supported his contentions.
However, there is quite a bit of supporting evidence from other sources. This is as follows:
(1) In 1964, J. Evetts Haley, a distinguished Texas historian, wrote "A Texan Looks at Lyndon." Millions of copies of this paperback were widely distributed. Haley's book provided concrete evidence concerning most of the murders outlined in my correspondence with Trott.
(2) In attempting to get Billie Sol immunity in 1984, I worked closely with Clint Peoples, U.S. Marshal for the Northern District of Texas. Peoples had followed the Estes' story for many years, having been assigned to the Estes' pending criminal case in the 1960's when he was a Texas Ranger. Peoples had several large file drawers containing materials about Estes and the murders that he showed me when I visited him in the U.S. Courthouse in Dallas. He was on good terms with Estes and constantly encouraged me to do my best to get Estes' story out. When he retired he became head of the Texas Rangers Museum in Waco, Texas, and in 1992 was killed in an automobile accident. Where Peoples' extensive files on Estes and the murders are today is unknown.
(3) I arranged for Lucianne Goldberg, then a literary agent and now sponsor of http://www.lucianne.com/, to visit Billie Sol in Abilene in 1984 in an effort to get his story published. Lucianne there disclosed to us that she had once met Malcolm (Mac) Wallace, who was the stone-cold killer retained by LBJ, when she had worked in the White House in LBJ's administration.
(4) The Texas Observer, a highly respected journal of opinion, published a thoroughly researched article by Bill Adler in its November 7, 1986 issue titled, "The Killing of Henry Marshall." The article is required reading for anyone interested in the murders.
(5) In 1998, a video titled "LBJ: A Closer Look" was released, having been produced by two Californians, Lyle and Theresa Sardie. The video contains interviews with key persons who knew of the murders and of the LBJ-Billie Sol connection.
(6) In 2003, the book "Blood, Money & Power: How LBJ murdered JFK" was published. Its author is Barr McClellan, father of Bush's current press secretary in the White House, Scott McClellan. Barr McClellan was a lawyer with the law firm in Austin that handled LBJ's secret financial empire before and after he became President.
(7) Also in 2003, the History Channel showed "The Men Who Killed Kennedy: The Final Chapter." Much of this show drew on McClellan's book and my letters to Trott. After it was telecast several times, immense pressure was brought upon the History Channel to withdraw the video from being offered for sale to the public. For the first time in its own history the History Channel succumbed to this outside pressure that was orchestrated by Jack Valenti, head of the Motion Pictures Association of America and former LBJ aide, and reluctantly withdrew the video from public circulation.
(8) Both Barr McClellan and I, among others, have in our possession documents and papers, too numerous and lengthy to detail here, that help to round out the full LBJ-Billie Sol story, including letters from LBJ to Billie Sol.
John Simkin: Could you explain in more detail what you mean by the phrase that the conservative movement in "had been hijacked by sociopaths and opportunists"?
Douglas Caddy: I became active politically while still in high school in New Orleans in the early 1950's. Later, as a student at Georgetown University, I helped organize the National Student Committee for the Loyalty Oath in 1959. This led to the creation of Youth for Goldwater for Vice President in early 1960 and later that year to Young Americans for Freedom. This was the genesis of the modern conservative movement in the United States.
In 1961 the first mass conservative rally, sponsored by YAF, was held in Manhattan Center in New York City. The next year an even larger rally was held in Madison Square Garden.
If I were to pinpoint when the conservative movement was first hijacked by sociopaths, I would say it took place in 1974, just after President Nixon was forced to resign. His resignation opened the way for the sociopaths to take over.
In late 1974, the board of directors of the Schuchman Foundation met. Robert Schuchman was the first national chairman of YAF. In attendance at the meeting, in addition to the foundation's directors, were Edwin Feulner, Paul Weyrich and Joseph Coors. Coors, president of Coors Beer Company, told the foundation directors that unless they did exactly what he and Feulner and Weyrich directed them to do, he would destroy them and their organization.
The Schuchman Foundation directors brushed aside Coors' threat. Shortly thereafter, Coors, Feulner and Weyrich organized the Heritage Foundation and the Committee for a Free Congress. The latter two organizations, extremely well funded in the last 30 years, have crafted the national legislation and federal regulations that have enriched the wealthy and crucified the poor and disabled in America.
Since 1974 the conservative movement and the Republican Party, dominated by sociopaths with no social conscience whatsoever, have successfully engaged in what I call "The Politics of Death."
In addition to the sociopaths, a large group of opportunists moved into the conservative movement and the GOP and gained power. The emerging Abramoff lobbying scandal, which leads directly to members of Congress and to the White House, is an example of this opportunism.
Before this scandal has run its course, other opportunists such as the hypocritical Christian leader Ralph Reed and his cohorts will be exposed for sacrificing the public good for their personal gain.

