Christian Socialism
On 10th April, 1848, a group of Christians who supported Chartism held a meeting in London. People who attended the meeting included Frederick Denison Maurice, Charles Kingsley, John Ludlow and Thomas Hughes. The meeting was a response to the decision by the House of Commons to reject the recent Chartist Petition. The men, who became known as Christian Socialists, discussed how the Church could help to prevent revolution by tackling what they considered were the reasonable grievances of the working class. (1)
Feargus O'Connor had been vicious attacks on other Chartist leaders such as William Lovett, Henry Hetherington, Bronterre O'Brien and Henry Vincent who advocated Moral Force. O'Connor questioned this strategy and began to make speeches where he spoke of being willing "to die for the cause" and promising to "lead people to death or glory". O'Connor became the leader of what became known as the Physical Force Chartists, Disturbed by these events members of the Christian Socialist movement volunteered to become special constables at these demonstrations. (2) John Ludlow later wrote: "The present generation has no idea of the terrorism which was at that time exercised by the Chartists." (3)
Frederick Denison Maurice was acknowledged as the leader of the group and his book The Kingdom of Christ (1838) became the theological basis of Christian Socialism. In the book Maurice argued that politics and religion are inseparable and that the church should be involved in addressing social questions. Maurice rejected individualism, with its competition and selfishness, and suggested a socialist alternative to the economic principles of laissez faire. He suggested profit sharing as a way of improving the status of the working classes and as a means of producing a just, Christian society. (4)

John Ludlow, a lawyer who had been deeply influenced by the socialist writer, Henri de Saint-Simon, was another important figure in the group. He sought to Christianize Socialism as he believed structural change was needed and charity was not enough. He had been a social worker in London and had commented: "It seemed to me that no serious effort was made to help a person out of his or her misery, but only to help him or her in it." (5) Ludlow also brought his colleague Frederick James Furnivall into the group. (6)
Politics for the People
In April 1849, Charles Kingsley wrote to his wife about the plan to publish a political newspaper. "I really cannot go home this afternoon. I have spent it with Archdeacon Hare, and Parker, starting a new periodical, a Penny People's Friend, in which Maurice, Hare, Ludlow, Mansfield, and I are going to set to work to supply the place of the defunct Saturday Magazine. I send you my first placard. Maurice is delighted with it. I cannot tell you the interest which it has excited with everyone who has seen it.... I have got already £2.10.0 towards bringing out more, and Maurice is subscription hunting for me." (7)
The following month Charles Kingsley, Frederick Denison Maurice, Thomas Hughes, Charles Blachford Mansfield and John Ludlow began publishing a penny journal, Politics for the People, and this was considered the starting-point of the Christian Socialist movement. It was "sympathetic to the poor and based upon the acknowledgment that God rules in human society... They addressed themselves to workmen. They confessed that they were not workmen, but asked for workmen's help in bridging the gulf that divided them". (8)

The journal was selling at about 2,000 copies an edition. (9) Charles Kingsley wrote several articles for the journal. He took the signature ‘Parson Lot,' on account of a discussion with his friends, in which, being in a minority of one, he had said that he felt like Lot, "when he seemed as one that mocked to his sons-in-law." (10) Charles Blachford Mansfield adopted the pseudonym Will Willow-wren. Mansfield agreed with other members of the group that the essays were designed to help the working man escape from "dull bricks and mortar and the ugly colourless things which fill the workshop and the factory." (11)
Charles Kingsley made it clear he was a supporter of Chartism: "My only quarrel with the Charter is, that it does not go far enough... Instead of being a book to keep the poor in order, it (the Bible) is a book, from beginning to end, written to keep the rich in order. It is our fault. We have used the Bible as if it was a mere special constable's handbook - an opium-dose for keeping beasts of burden patient while they were being over-loaded." (12)
Charles Blachford Mansfield's theology was based more on a rationalist concept of a Divine Idea than on a clear Christian faith. When his father heard of his involvement in the Christian Socialist movement he immediately cut his allowance, and Mansfield adopted the vegetarian diet and simple lifestyle for which he became renowned. However, it had a serious impact on his ability to finance the group's publishing ventures. (13)

During the summer of 1848, Charles Blachford Mansfield, Charles Kingsley, Thomas Hughes and John Ludlow would have editorial meetings at the house of Frederick Denison Maurice. Important socialists of the day, including Robert Owen, the owner of the New Lanark Mills and Thomas Cooper, one of the leaders of the Chartist movement, sometimes took part in these discussions. (14)
Politics for the People was an expensive journal to produce and by July 1848, after seventeen editions, the decision was taken to stop publication. However, the group continued to meet, generally in Ludlow's chambers, and a result of their discussions was the foundation of a night school in Little Ormond Yard. (15)
Christian Socialist Journal
The group continued to meet on a regular basis. New members included Lloyd Jones, who had opened a Cooperative store in Salford in 1831. Leaders of the Chartist movement, including Feargus O'Connor and Bronterre O'Brien attended meetings. The Scottish tailor Walter Cooper, introduced two watchcase finishers, Joseph Millbank and Thomas Shorter, to the group. (16)
Even liberal newspapers became concerned by the Christian Socialists support for the trade union movement and the idea of cooperation rather than capitalism. The Daily News argued: " to erect on their unfortunate workshops of Christian Socialism, as Mr Maurice, of King's College, in the Strand, is pleased to term his hostility to the principle of commercial competition, about which he seems to know as much as it is to be presumed he does of single stitch. Already there are attempts to connect the working tailors' case with the teaching of the Communist doctrine." (17)
On 2nd November, 1850, the group launched a new journal, Christian Socialist. "On its first page it stated what it was trying to do: "A new idea has gone abroad into the world. That is Socialism, the latest-born of the forces now at work in modern society, and Christianity, the eldest born of those forces, are in their nature not hostile, but akin to each other, or rather that the one is but the development, the outgrowth, the manifestation of the other, so that even the strangest and most monstrous forms of Socialism are at bottom but Christian heresies. That Christianity, however feeble and torpid it may seem to many just now, is truly but as an eagle at moult, shedding its worn-out plumage; that Socialism is but the livery of the nineteenth century (as Protestantism was its livery of the sixteenth) which is now putting on, to spread long its mighty wings for a broader and heavenlier flight. That Socialism without Christianity, on the one hand, is as lifeless as the feathers without the bird, however skillfully the stuffer may dress them up into an artificial semblance of life; and that therefore every socialist system which has endeavoured to stand alone has hitherto in practice either blown up or dissolved away; whilst almost every socialist system which has maintained itself for anytime has endeavoured to stand, or unconsciously to itself has stood, upon those moral grounds of righteous, self-sacrifice, mutual affection, common brotherhood, which Christianity vindicates to itself for an everlasting heritage." (18)
John Ludlow was the editor of this new venture. It was to be a rule of the journal that writers should be anonymous, a common practice of the time. Ludlow's pen-name was John Townsend, or J.T. It was announced in the first edition that the journal would cover the entire spectrum of English life: free trade, education, the land question, poor laws, reform of the law, sanitary reform, taxation, finance, and Church reform. (19)

John Ludlow pointed out in his first editorial: "We do not mean to eschew Politics.We shall have Chartists writing for us, and Conservatives, and yet we hope not to quarrel, having this one common ground of Socialism, just as on the ground we hope not to quarrel, though the professing Christian be mixed in our ranks with those who have hitherto passed for Infidels." (20)
The journal was remarkable value at a penny a copy, for it was about 16,000 words of closely packed material with no paid advertising. It sold around 1,500 copies a week, in spite of its difficulties in finding any distributors to handle it. Brenda Colloms has argued: "Anyone who bought the first copy, and continued to buy it each week would find he had embarked upon an adult education course of a highly specialized nature." (21)
Chartists had been suspicious of Politics for the People and had not read it for that reason, decided that perhaps they should give this middle-class group a chance, and they began to read the Christian Socialist. Many found it to their liking and wrote articles for it. This included Gerald Massey, a genuine people's poet. Massey, the son of a canal boatman, was born in a hut at Gamble Wharf, on 29 May 1828. His father brought up a large family on a weekly wage of some ten shillings. Massey said of himself that he "had no childhood." After a scanty education at the national school at Tring, Massey was when eight years of age put to work at a silk mill. (22)

By 1850 Gerald Massey had moved to London and was working as a freelance journalist. John Ludlow was disturbed that Massey was a follower of George Julian Harney and was a regular contributor to the Red Republican. Ludlow was eager to have Massey write for his paper but made it clear that he had to stop writing for those publications that supported Physical Force Chartism. According to Brenda Colloms: "Massey did not object, for like so many working-class men reared on Nonconformist religious books and ideas, he found the ideas of brotherhood in associations more emotionally satisfying than the cooler and more impersonal socialist dogma." (23)
Another working class agitator who contributed to the Christian Socialist was John James Bezer. He in the past had been one of the leaders of the Chartist movement calling for revolution. On the 26 July 1848 Bezer attended a meeting chaired by John Shaw of the City Lecture Theatre, Milton Street, Cripplegate, where the subject was "Of bringing before the Legislature and the Public the despotic treatment of the Chartist victims." A strong force of police was standing by in case of disturbance. Two days later, at the same venue, Bezer conducted a public meeting condemning the Government's handling of the current problems in Ireland. It was reported that some 1,000 persons mostly Irish were in attendance both inside and outside the hall. Also present were the police and reporters who took notes of what men said at the meeting. (24) Several men at the meeting, including Bezer, George Shell (shoemaker), John Maxwell Bryson (dentist) and Robert Crowe (tailor) were arrested and charged with sedition. (25)
In court it was claimed that Bezer had called on Chartists "to destroy the power of the Queen, and establish a Republic." Bezer was accused of telling people that he would be able to supply 50 fighting men, and that they "were going to get up a bloody revolution". Bezer, Shell, Bryson and Crowe were all found guilty of sedition. According to The Leicestershire Mercury "The jury returned a verdict of guilty; and the other defendants who had been convicted to receive sentence. Mr Baron Platt in passing sentence, addressed them at some length upon their conduct, and told them as the sentence passed upon them at a previous session did not appear to have deterred them, it was clear an increase of severity of punishment must be resorted to: He then sentenced George Smelt, Robert Crowe, and John James Bezer to be imprisoned in the house of correction for two years, to pay a fine of £10 each to the Queen, and at the expiration of their imprisonment to enter into their own recognizances in £100 with two securities of £50 each, to keep the peace for five years." (26)

John James Bezer met John Ludlow and agreed to contribute to the The Christian Socialist. Ten chapters of Bezer's autobiography were published as installments in the journal from 9 August 1851. David Shaw has argued that the autobiography "considering the circumstances, surprisingly well written - record forms both an interesting and an important portrayal, at first hand, of working-class life in Dickensian London." (27)
Soon afterwards John James Bezer met John Bedford Leno at a Christian Socialist meeting. Leno agreed with Bezer that violence between the Chartists and the police was inevitable, and that arms should be carried. Leno later wrote in his autobiography: "In truth, I was for rebellion and civil war, and despaired of ever obtaining justice, or what I then conceived it to be, save by revolution." (28) Leno, who had been apprentice in the printing trade and it was agreed that they should a printers's cooperative, and The Christian Socialist journal became its main customer. (29)

George Julian Harney, a great supporter of John James Bezer, was disgusted by this development. Harney had used his newspaper, The Red Republican to promote Physical Force Chartism. With the help of his friend, Ernest Jones, Harney attempted to use his paper to educate his working class readers about socialism and internationalism. Harney also attempted to convert the trade union movement to socialism. Harney knew that the The Christian Socialist movement was totally opposed to the use of violence and feared that Bezer had "gone over to the enemy". (30)
The journal had a dual purpose. It was a vehicle of Christian Socialist propaganda on the one hand and a "Journal of Association", giving news of current associations and instructions on how to form new ones, on the other. The Christian Socialist became the official mouthpiece of the Christian Socialist movement and resulted in conflict between Frederick Denison Maurice and John Ludlow the editor. Maurice was critical of some of the articles that called for universal suffrage. Ludlow also refused to publish an article by Charles Kingsley on the Bible story of the Canaanites for its incipient racism. (31)
Joseph Millbank and Thomas Shorter, joint secretaries of the Society of Promoters, argued the cooperation was needed to combat poverty in Britain. "We have become rivals where we ought to have become brethren, and have competed with each other when we ought to have cooperated - rivals, with more or less of hate, and hosts of expedients to disguise its hideousness and make it respectable." (32)
The editorship of the The Christian Socialist dominated the life of John Ludlow and he was devastated when it had to stop publication on 28th June 1851 because it was losing too much money. Ludlow and other Christian Socialists now concentrated on publishing pamphlets. However, this caused conflict amongst the leaders. In 1852 Frederick Denison Maurice concluded that the "idea of Christian Socialism were so divergent that only confusion was created when they spoke up." Ludlow agreed and said that different members "had meant different things by the words they used." (33)
Cooperative Workshops
The Christian Socialists discussed the idea of establishing cooperative workshops. An early suggestion was one involving the clothing industry. One member of the group, Charles Kingsley, had been interested in the subject for sometime and at that time he was working on a pamphlet, Cheap Clothes and Nasty and a novel, Alton Locke with the objective of exposing the sweatshop system. (34)
Henry Mayhew in the Morning Chronicle also wrote about the conditions and poverty of people working as tailors. One woman told him: "I used to work at the shirt work - the fine full-fronted white shirts; I got 2d. each for them. There were six button-holes, four rows of stitching in the front, and the collars and wristbands stitched as well. By working from five o'clock in the morning till midnight each night I might be able to do seven in the week. Out of this the cotton must be taken and that came to 2d. every week. It was impossible for me to live. I was forced to go out of a night to make out my living. I had a child, and it used to cry for food. So, as I could not get a living for him myself by the needle, I went into the streets and made out a living that way. I pledge my word, solemnly and sacredly, that it was the low price paid for my labour that drove me to prostitution. In my heart I hated it; my whole nature rebelled at it, and nobody but God knows how I struggled to give it up." (35)
During his research Kingsley interviewed a tailor called Robert Crowe who also joined the Christian Socialist movement. He later wrote: "The Rev. Charles Kingsley, while engaged collecting material for his great work, Alton Locke, a work which has unquestionably done more to expose the pernicious nature of the sweating system than all other agencies put together, was informed that I, having worked in some of the sweating cribs of London, might furnish him with useful information on the subject, and sent me an invitation, which I was not slow to avail myself of." (36)
Charles Kingsley had commented: "Competition is put forth as the law of the universe. That is a lie. The time has come for us to declare that it is a lie by word and deed. I see no way but associating for work instead of for strikes." (37) Walter Cooper, who had considerable experience as a tailor also supported the suggestion. On 17th January 1850, Cooper had spoken at a meeting of Journeyman tailors at Exeter Hall. Cooper and other tailors were protesting against the practices of their trade and voted to petition Parliament to appoint a committee to investigate the exploitation of their labour. (38)
At a meeting of about twenty people at the home of Frederick Denison Maurice it was decided to form the Cooperative Association of Working Tailors, that, they hoped, would end capitalist owners' exploitation. It was founded on a resolution which stated that "individual selfishness, as embodied in the competitive system, lies at the root of the evils under which English industry now suffers: the remedy for the evils of competition lies in the brotherly and Christian principle of Co-operation, that is, of joint work, with shared or common profits." (39)
Walter Cooper was chosen as manager and a committee was elected to raise money for rent, purchase of material and cash in hand for wages, a sum of £350. Operating rules were formulated and a three-year lease was signed on the 18th January on a spacious building at 34 East Castle Street, just off Oxford Street. Another political radical, Gerald Massey, was employed as the company's bookkeeper (40)
Robert Crowe, a Christian Socialist and tailor, was in prison for taking place in a Chartist demonstration when was released from prison in the summer of 1850. "On Monday morning, at 6 am nearly 2,000 persons assembled at the gate to greet me as I crossed the threshold." (41) The Christian Socialist movement had been monitoring the situation and was keen to set up a series of cooperatives. Charles Kingsley, Crowe's old friend, had commented: "Competition is put forth as the law of the universe. That is a lie. The time has come for us to declare that it is a lie by word and deed. I see no way but associating for work instead of for strikes." (42)
Crowe later explained that: "A few days later (after my release from prison) I received an invitation from the manager of the Tailors' Cooperative Association, Walter Cooper, offering me the privilege of work. I accepted and have commenced my acquaintance with the young and gifted poet, Gerald Massey, whose Lyrics of Freedom have become favourites with all liberal minds throughout the Kingdom. He was the bookkeeper to the association. (43)

Workrooms on the top floor, with offices and a shop on the lower floors were fitted out, and the building opened for business with twelve employees on 11th February 1850. Wages for the workers soon compared favourably with those of other trades, averaging 24s per week. That month, Frederick Denison Maurice published the first of a series of eight Tracts on Christian Socialism in which he presented, so he thought, his own clear convictions on the subject. "In general, Christian Socialism was taken to mean a restructuring of labour based on co-operation, joint ownership and with increased power to the working class." (44)
The promoters of the Christian Socialists with their high clerical connections received visits from many upper class persons of distinction who were desirous of seeing at first hand the practical work being achieved by the associations. This included Samuel Wilberforce, the Bishop of Oxford, for a new set of liveries. (45) It is claimed that the Bishop told Cooper: "Well, now, Mr Cooper, this is really delightful, to see a number of men while engaged at their work singing praises to the glory of God. I am delighted at this spectacle!" (46)
In 1851 Edward Vansittart Neale and Thomas Hughes, without the direct sanction of the Christian Socialist Council, they established the Central Co-operative Agency, which anticipated the Co-operative Wholesale Society. Some of the members strongly disapproved of this experiment. The publication of an address to the trade societies of London and the United Kingdom, inviting them to support the agency as "a legal and financial institution for aiding the formation of stores and associations, for buying and selling on their behalf, and ultimately for organising credit and exchange between them" brought matters to a crisis, and an attempt was made to exclude Neale and Hughes from the council. (47)
An important figure in the cooperative movement was Edward Vansittart Neale whose wealth helped to subsidize the Tailors' Cooperative Association. Progress was swift in the establishment of other working associations. By the time of the first annual conference of the Society for Promoting Working Men's Associations in the summer of 1852 there were twelve associations up and running, covering tailors, builders, shoemakers, pianomakers, printers and bakers.(48)
Thomas Hughes was a passionate supporter of the cooperative movement and later wrote: "We were all full of enthusiasm and hope in our work, and of propagandist zeal: anxious to bring in all the recruits we could. I cannot even now think of my own state of mind at the time without wonder and amusement. I certainly thought (and for that matter have never altered my opinion to this day) that here we had found the solution of the great labour question; but I was also convinced that we had nothing to do but just to announce it, and found an association or two, in order to convert all England, and usher in the millennium at once, so plain did the whole thing seem to me." (49)

Leading figures in the Christian Socialist movement toured the country advocating cooperative workshops. This included Lloyd Jones, who was "one of the keenest and most eloquent of cooperators, was put in charge as a missionary for the agency, and for cooperation in the North generally." Also heavily involved was John Ludlow who organised a cooperative conference in Bury on 18th April 1851. He argued that "the idea of a provincial wholesale depot is in the minds of all the Lancashire cooperatives; that the plan for its establishment is already drawn up... and that the only question respecting it is whether it shall be set up in Manchester or Rochdale." (50)
Walter Cooper was in great demand as a national speaker on the subjects of Christian Socialism, Worker's Cooperatives and Chartism. Some people claimed that Cooper was not spending enough time at Cooperative Association of Working Tailors and an investigation of the books suggested there were sixty false items in the accounts. Brenda Colloms claimed "that only four items could be said to be wrong, and those seemed to be the result of inexperience and sloppiness, so that any insinuation of fraud were baseless." (51) However, Chris Bryant, the author of Possible Dreams: A Personal History of the British Christian Socialist (1996) argues that "Walter Cooper turned out to be a weak manager and absconded with some of the Castle Street funds." (52)
The Tailors' Cooperative Association came to an end in about May 1852. One observer argued that the "association crumbled... owing to those internal causes which no success can prevent". However, Thomas Hughes, gave another reason when discussing his brother's involvement in the venture: "He continued to pay his subscription, and to get his clothes at our tailors' association till it failed, which was more than some of our number did, for the cut was so bad as to put the sternest principles to a severe test. But I could see that this was done out of kindness to me, and not from sympathy with what we were doing." (53)
In 1852 Edward Vansittart Neale gave support to Caroline Southwood Hill and her daughters, including Octavia Hill, in the forming the Ladies' Cooperative Guild, a co-operative craft workshop for girls. Its aim was to give training to disadvantaged girls and young women in the making of ornamental glass and toy furniture. Based at 4 Russell Place, Bloomsbury, it was an early important initiative supporting the drive to increase women's employment opportunities. Southwood was appointed manager and book-keeper. (54)

Southwood Hill, published an article about the venture in Household Words, a magazine owned by Charles Dickens. "There is a large, light, lofty workshop, situated in one of the best thoroughfares of the town, in which are occupied about two dozen girls between the ages of eight and seventeen. They make choice furniture for dolls houses. They work in groups, each group having its own department of the little trade... A young lady whose age is not so great as that of the majority of the workers - only whose education has been infinitely better - rules over the little band; apportions the work; distributes the material; keeps the accounts; stops the disputes; stimulates the intellect, and directs the recreation of all." She compares her power to the Tsar of Russia "but the two potentates differ in this, that the one governs by fear, the other by affection." (55)
Frederick Denison Maurice offered to take a Bible class for the children working in the toy factory. The prospect of Maurice coming to the Ladies' Cooperative Guild horrified the evangelical ladies who supported it, and who sent to it the toymaker children from the Ragged School Union. They threatened to withdraw all support if Maurice gave his Bible class. Caroline Southwood Hill protested, and she was dismissed in late 1855. The Guild did not last long after her departure, although the toymaking carried on for a few more months. (56)

Edward Vansittart Neale continued to be a passionate supporter of the cooperative movement and in the early 1850s he put over £60,000 into launching twelve co-operative workshops for various trades. (19) Neale prophesied that "an incalculable amount of good of every sort will arise... The great thing to impress upon the minds of the workers is the importance of seeking to raise the position of their class instead of limiting their efforts to raising their own position as individuals." (57)
Working Men's College
In May 1848 John Ludlow, Frederick Denison Maurice and Charles Kingsley decided to publish a penny journal, Politics for the People, and this was considered the starting-point of the Christian Socialist movement. It was "sympathetic to the poor and based upon the acknowledgment that God rules in human society... They addressed themselves to workmen. They confessed that they were not workmen, but asked for workmen's help in bridging the gulf that divided them". (58) The paper only lasted till July, but the group continued to meet, generally in Ludlow's chambers, and a result of their discussions was the foundation of a night school in Little Ormond Yard. (59)
In 1852 Charles Blachford Mansfield argued that a Working Men's College was a natural development from the night classes in Little Ormond Yard. However, Mansfield failed to follow upon the idea. However, that winter several members of the group did provide lectures on a variety of different subjects. This included Frederick Denison Maurice on William Shakespeare, Walter Cooper on the genius of Robert Burns, George Frederick Robinson on entomology, John Pyke Hullah on how to start a singing class, Richard Chenevix Trench on Proverbs, and Frank Cranmer Penrose on architecture. (60)
Frederick Denison Maurice had always been more interested in education than economics and was especially interested in establishing a Working Men's College. Radical speeches by other Christian Socialists also caused problems from his employers. After one speech by Charles Kingsley, on 22nd June 1851, The principal of King's College wrote to him hoping that he would disown Kingsley's utterances, which he deplored as "reckless and dangerous". Although he did not agree completely with Kingsley he refused to criticise his old friend. (61)
The publication of Maurice's Theological Essays in 1853 provoked even more controversy. Richard William Jelf, the Principal of King's College, was concerned that Maurice was being attacked by almost every section of the religious establishment because of his outspoken social views. Jelf also objected to him being associated with George Holyoake, the main promoter of Secularism. Jelf asked Maurice to resign. He refused and demanded that he be either "acquitted or dismissed." He was dismissed. (62)
On the news of his dismissal, over a thousand working-men, representing around a hundred occupations, published a letter of support for Maurice. "That you may long continue to pursue your useful and honourable career: that the eminent services you have confessedly rendered to the Church and to the cause of education, may meet with a more generous and grateful appreciation; that those who at present misunderstand and misrepresent you may learn by your example and that they may at least emulate you in the wisdom and zeal with which you had advocated the cause of the working-man, is the sincere and earnest desire of those whose names are hereunto appended." (63)
On reading the statement Maurice decided he would now put all his efforts into the formation of a Working Men's College. On 10th January, 1854, Maurice wrote to Charles Kingsley that he hoped that "my college" would soon be established. (64) The following day a meeting was held in Maurice's house that was attended by Thomas Hughes, Lloyd Jones and Edward Vansittart Neale, where it was agreed that the Promoters' Committee of Teaching and Publication be empowered to frame, and if possible carry out a plan to set up a People's College in London. (65)
Frederick Denison Maurice then drew up more concrete plans for a people's college that was to be founded in the premises of one of the failed associations at 31 Red Lion Square. In June and July a series of fund-raising lectures was given, and the college was ready for business in time for October, with a wide range of subjects and an interesting set of lecturers. The college was to be aimed specifically at the manual workers, and Maurice agreed to be Principle of the Working Men's College. (66)
It opened on 31st October 1854, with some 176 students. The most popular classes were Languages, English Grammar, Mathematics, Drawing whereas History, Law, Politics and the Physical Sciences attracted smaller attendance. Later the Working Men's College moved, first to Great Ormond Street and then to Crowndale Road. (67)

Some of the teachers at the college included Edward Vansittart Neale, John Ludlow, Thomas Hughes, Lloyd Jones, John Ruskin, Frederick James Furnival, Charles Blachford Mansfield, Lowes Cato Dickinson and Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Founder member of the Christian Socialists, Charles Kingsley, never taught at the college but popularized it whenever he could. (68)
Disagreements between members resulted in the Christian Socialists being inactive between 1854 and the late 1870s. The 1880s saw a revival of the movement and by the end of the century a variety of Christian Socialist groups had been formed including the Socialist Quaker Society, the Roman Catholic Socialist Society, the Guild of St. Matthew, and the Christian Social Union.
Christian Socialists also dominated the leadership of the Independent Labour Party formed in 1893. This included James Keir Hardie, Philip Snowden, Ben Tillett, Tom Mann, Katharine Glasier, Margaret McMillan and Rachel McMillan.
The Christian Socialist movement also influenced many of the leaders of the American Socialist Party such as Norman Thomas and Upton Sinclair.
On the outbreak of the First World War a large number of Christian Socialists joined the No-Conscription Fellowship (NCF), an organisation formed by Clifford Allen and Fenner Brockway, that encouraged men to refuse war service. The NCF required its members to "refuse from conscientious motives to bear arms because they consider human life to be sacred."
Wilfred Wellock, a Christian Socialist, joined the Independent Labour Party. "As I moved about the country after 1920 it was next to impossible to secure a response to any kind of spiritual appeal... The only organisation that appeared to be advancing was the Independent Labour Party... The rapid march of the socialist movement in Britain at this time, with the Independent Labour party as its spearhead, owed its success to its essentially spiritual appeal. The ILP inherited the spiritual idealism of the early Christian Socialists and of the artist-poet-craftmanship school of William Morris... This was the only kind of socialism that appealed to me... I am a socialist, provided you give a spiritual interpretation to the term... I have only recently decided to enter practical politics since I have seen the possibility of making politics, through the introduction of spiritual considerations, a veritable means of social transformation."
In 1921 Wellock published Christian Communism. He argued that is " our business is to create a Christian Communist consciousness, and to let the revolution, or what there be, come out of that... We must concentrate upon the ideal, preach and teach it everywhere, proclaim it in the cities, in the churches, at the street corners - go into the highways and the hedges and compel the people to see life anew, and in the light of a finer ideal to re-create the world."
There was a revival of Christian Socialism after the outbreak of the Second World War. The writer, John Middleton Murry, argued for "socialist-communities, prepared for hardship and practised in brotherhood, might be the nucleus of a new Christian Society, much as the monasteries were during the dark ages."
Primary Sources
(1) The Christian Socialist (2nd November 1850)
A new idea has gone abroad into the world. That is Socialism, the latest-born of the forces now at work in modern society, and Christianity, the eldest born of those forces, are in their nature not hostile, but akin to each other, or rather that the one is but the development, the outgrowth, the manifestation of the other, so that even the strangest and most monstrous forms of Socialism are at bottom but Christian heresies. That Christianity, however feeble and torpid it may seem to many just now, is truly but as an eagle at moult, shedding its worn-out plumage; that Socialism is but the livery of the nineteenth century (as Protestantism was its livery of the sixteenth) which is now putting on, to spread long its mighty wings for a broader and heavenlier flight. That Socialism without Christianity, on the one hand, is as lifeless as the feathers without the bird, however skilfully the stuffer may dress them up into an artificial semblance of life; and that therefore every socialist system which has endeavoured to stand alone has hitherto in practice either blown up or dissolved away; whilst almost every socialist system which has maintained itself for anytime has endeavoured to stand, or unconsciously to itself has stood, upon those moral grounds of righteous, self-sacrifice, mutual affection, common brotherhood, which Christianity vindicates to itself for an everlasting heritage.
(2) The Daily News (1st April 1850)
The case of the working tailors... is... to some extent, a remedial one; provided, however, the sufferers do not allow themselves to fall into the hands of persons who seek to turn their case into an illustration that humanity and political economy are irreconcilable, and to erect on their unfortunate workshops of Christian Socialism, as Mr Maurice, of King's College, in the Strand, is pleased to term his hostility to the principle of commercial competition, about which he seems to know as much as it is to be presumed he does of single stitch. Already there are attempts to connect the working tailors' case with the teaching of the Communist doctrine .
(3) Percy Redfern, The Story of the CWS: 1863-1913 (1913)
In this narrative we shall need to visit Rochdale more than once. Upon the solid basis of success which the Pioneers laid in 1844 the Rochdale corn mill was erected in 1850, and the experience gained through this federal mill largely contributed to the shaping of the Wholesale Society. But for the moment we must turn aside to discover another movement separated from pure Owenism. Removed from Rochdale and its weavers, this second development proceeded during the same period. In 1844 Frederick Denison Maurice was joined by Charles Kingsley, and within the next few years the adhesion of Ludlow, Mansfield, Hughes, Neale and others increased the brilliance and distinction of the little band of Christian Socialists. Nowadays there are rectors, deacons, and even bishops who would call themselves socialists simply; but in 1850 the term had a different meaning. Maurice and his friends felt it necessary to assert their position. Writing to Ludlow in January, 1850, Maurice declared that the term "Christian Socialism" would "commit us at once to the conflict we must engage in sooner or later with the unsocial Christians and the unchristian socialists." The idea of co-operation, which Owen had proclaimed, was now by most people despised and rejected. The Christian Socialists meant to glorify the Christian idea of brotherhood which they found at the core of it; while, with equal force, they declared themselves not Owenites. (page 10)
(4) In his book, Father Figures, Kingsley Martin, the son of a Unitarian minister, explained the role of Nonconformists in the history of social reform.
Social revolt in Britain had sprung from dissent. The leaders of Chartism learnt their eloquence in dissenting chapels and the Anti-Corn agitation was led by Quakers and other nonconformists. Dissenters became the backbone of the working-class party, and the ILP was composed of dissenting moralists who would not accept the usual political compromises. They readily responded to the oratory of lay preachers like Philip Snowden and Arthur Henderson, and it is no accident that so many of the leaders of the Labour Party have been Christians who believed they were inaugurating a moral and social revolution. Morality and politics were one.
(5) James Keir Hardie, From Serfdom to Socialism (1907)
This generation has grown up ignorant of the fact that socialism is as old as the human race. When civilization dawned upon the world, primitive man was living his rude Communistic life, sharing all things in common with every member of the tribe. Later when the race lived in villages, man, the communist, moved about among the communal flocks and herds on communal land. The peoples who have carved their names most deeply on the tables of human story all set out on their conquering career as communists, and their downward path begins with the day when they finally turned away from it and began to gather personal possessions. When the old civilizations were putrefying, the still small voice of Jesus the Communist stole over the earth like a soft refreshing breeze carrying healing wherever it went.
(6) In 1910 James Keir Hardie explained the influence that Christianity had on his political beliefs.
I have said, both in writing and from the platform many times, that the impetus which drove me first into the Labour movement, and the inspiration which has carried me on in it, has been derived more from the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth than from all other sources combined.
(7) After attending her first Christian Socialist meeting in Edinburgh, Rachel McMillan wrote to her cousin about her new views (24th March, 1887)
I am sending with this letter some of Mr. Gilray's pamphlets on Socialism. I am very glad to have had them, and could never have collected them for myself. I think that, very soon, when these teachings and ideas are better known, people generally will declare themselves Socialists. They are bound to do it, if they think at all. I instinctively felt they were good people, and now I believe they are the true disciples and followers of Christ.
(8) Tom Mann, Memoirs (1923)
One of my Nonconformist friends was Rev. Belcher, minister of the Congregational Church, Hackney. He invited me to occupy the pulpit, and I did so. There was a great congregation, and when in the heart of my address I denounced the hypocrisy of the churches, there were hisses. as I proceeded there were cheers, and for the space of thirty or forty minutes there was frequent alternations of cheering and hissing.
My close friendship with various ministers of religion led to the circulation of a report that I was about to enter the Church. One morning a pressman called upon me to ask what truth there was in the statement that appeared in The Times: "We are informed that Mr. Tom Mann, the well-known Labour leader, is an accepted candidate for Deacon's orders in the Church of England."
(9) Rev. Roden Noel, Christianity and Social Advance (1893)
Surely that man or woman is no Christian at all, except in name, in so far as he or she remains indifferent to the awful abyss that yarns between rich and poor; to the insufficiency of the share in our immense wealth which falls to the lot of those who produce it.
(10) Brooke Foss Westcott, Bishop of Durham, speech as President of the Christian Social Union (1890)
Socialism is co-operation, the method of Individualism is competition. The one regards man as working with man for a common end, the other regards man as working against man for private gain. The aim of Socialism is the fulfillment of service, the aim of Individualism is the attainment of some personal advantage, riches, or place of fame. socialism seeks such an organisation of life as shall secure for every one the most complete development of his power. Individualism seeks primarily the satisfaction of the particular wants of each one in the hope that the pursuit of private interests will in the end secure public welfare.
(11) Wilfred Wellock, Christian Communism (1921)
I do not think it is possible to say how the transition to communism will be made. More than that, I do not think we should greatly concern ourselves about that question: our business is to create a Christian Communist consciousness, and to let the revolution, or what there be, come out of that...
We must concentrate upon the ideal, preach and teach it everywhere, proclaim it in the cities, in the churches, at the street corners - go into the highways and the hedges and compel the people to see life anew, and in the light of a finer ideal to re-create the world... to create a public opinion, organise a spiritual movement for the overthrow of Capitalism and the establishment of Communism which will be positively irresistible...
Great changes are necessary... and if we do not accomplish them by means of a vigorous and aggressive pacifist policy they will be attempted by methods more drastic if less successful.
(12) Andrew Rigby, A Life in Peace: A Biography of Wilfred Wellock (1988)
Middleton Murry decided to practise what he was preaching and establish his own advance post of the new Christendom on a 183 acre farm in Suffolk in October 1942. He too noticed "a strange carelessness, amounting to a resentment of order" amongst the membership. This was particularly the case with regard to the farm tools: in a situation where they were considered to belong to the community as a whole, too often no-one took responsibility for caring after them, symptomatic in Murry's mind of "a rank confusion of thought, which sees no difference between non-attachment to possessions and carelessness towards them." As in the case of so many community projects, factions developed between the dozen or so individualists who made up the membership. Murry was subjected to a lot of criticism as he insisted on retaining financial control of the farm, having invested all his capital in the project. Murry, for his part, charged that like most zealots for "community", they did not really think about finances at all. They were fascinated by their own Utopian vision of self-governing community - a vision uncontaminated by mundane realities. Like communities before and since, the farm seemed to attract more than its fair share of eccentrics and oddballs - people who appeared to be motivated more by the desire to escape the constraints and responsibilities of the "outside world" rather than by a positive vision of how to remake the world.
(13) Wilfred Wellock, Off the Beaten Track - Adventures in the Art of Living (1961)
Most socialists rested their case solely on the economic argument, whereas I saw the basic error of capitalism in certain spiritual deficiencies, and realised that unless these deficiencies were made good little would be gained in the long run, and my unresolved problem was how the socialists would carry the spiritual idealism of their prophets into the new social order...
I began to feel that the most urgent need of our time was knowledge of how to live, in every section of the community, capitalists and workers alike, and that it might be my duty to take some part in spreading this knowledge of the art of living, by word, by pen, and by living.
(14) Fred Copeman, Reason in Revolt (1948)
In my political work I have found that my Christian experience has given me a fresh dynamic. I am certain that the Labour Party will lead this country to success if it clings to the fundamental principles of Christianity in its interpretation of our modern industrial and social problems. Dialectical materialism as expressed by Marx and Lenin, seems to me an excuse to enable individuals to ignore personal moral standards and to justify themselves under the cloak of proletarian interests. The working class to me is made up of millions of human beings like myself, with the same human kindnesses, the same hatreds, the same weaknesses and the same aspirations. True happiness cannot come to the workers at the expense of the happiness of any other section of the population. It can only be obtained by justifying the claims of the working people in the eyes of their opponents. The success of Socialism can only be achieved by ensuring that all people see the justice and the beauty of it, and willingly join in building it.
No true philosophy can endure on a basis of hatred. Socialism, to me, is beautiful and practical. There is nothing more practical than a freely convinced human mind; all other things, all other sacrifices, all successes, will come from that. People in the mass will be convinced when they see living examples of the beliefs which modern politicians proclaim.
Student Activities
References
(1) Alan Wilkinson, Christian Socialism (1998) page 16
(2) Chris Bryant, Possible Dreams: A Personal History of the British Christian Socialist (1996) page 34
(3) John Ludlow, The Autobiography of a Christian Socialist (1981) page 65
(4) Bernard Reardon, Frederick Denison Maurice: Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (25th May, 2006)
(5) Alan M. Suggate, William Temple and Christian Social Ethics Today (1987) page 20
(6) Chris Bryant, Possible Dreams: A Personal History of the British Christian Socialist (1996) page 43
(7) Charles Kingsley, letter to Frances Kingsley (12th April, 1848)
(8) Owen Chadwick, The Victorian Church (1966) page 352
(9) Chris Bryant, Possible Dreams: A Personal History of the British Christian Socialist (1996) page 43
(10) Leslie Stephen, Charles Kingsley: Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (1900)
(11) Susan Chitty, The Beast and the Monk: A Life of Charles Kingsley (1974) page 110
(12) Owen Chadwick, The Victorian Church (1966) page 352-353
(13) Chris Bryant, Possible Dreams: A Personal History of the British Christian Socialist (1996) page 43
(14) Susan Chitty, The Beast and the Monk: A Life of Charles Kingsley (1974) page 110
(15) Norman Moore, John Malcolm Forbes Ludlow: Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (1912)
(16) Chris Bryant, Possible Dreams: A Personal History of the British Christian Socialist (1996) page 47
(17) The Daily News (1st April 1850)
(18) The Christian Socialist (2nd November, 1850)
(19) Brenda Colloms, Victorian Visionaries (1982) page 85
(20) John Ludlow, The Christian Socialist (2nd November, 1850)
(21) Brenda Colloms, Victorian Visionaries (1982) page 89
(22) Sidney Lee, Gerald Massey: Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (1912)
(23) Brenda Colloms, Victorian Visionaries (1982) page 87
(24) David Shaw, James John Bezer (2008)
(25) The Norfolk News (2nd September 1848)
(26) The Leicestershire Mercury (2nd September 1848)
(27) David Shaw, James John Bezer (2008)
(28) John Bedford Leno, Aftermath: The Autobiography of John Bedford Leno (1892) page 28
(29) Michael Sanders, John Bedford Leno: Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (14th April 2022)
(30) Brenda Colloms, Victorian Visionaries (1982) pages 87-88
(31) Chris Bryant, Possible Dreams: A Personal History of the British Christian Socialist (1996) page 55
(32) Brenda Colloms, Victorian Visionaries (1982) pages 88-89
(33) Edward Norman, The Victorian Christian Socialists (1987) page 2
(34) Leslie Stephen, Charles Kingsley: Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (1900)
(35) Henry Mayhew, The Morning Chronicle (13th November, 1849)
(36) Robert Crowe, Reminiscences of an Octogenarian (1902) page 8
(37) Charles Kingsley, speech (2nd January, 1850)
(38) The Morning Chronicle (18th January, 1850)
(39) Charles E. Raven, Christian Socialism 1848-1854 (1920) page 151
(40) Brenda Colloms, Victorian Visionaries (1982) page 70
(41) Robert Crowe, Reminiscences of an Octogenarian (1902) page 14
(42) Brenda Colloms, Victorian Visionaries (1982) page 70
(43) Robert Crowe, Reminiscences of an Octogenarian (1902) page 14
(44) David Shaw, Gerald Massey (2008)
(45) Chris Bryant, Possible Dreams: A Personal History of the British Christian Socialist (1996) page 51
(46) David Shaw, Gerald Massey (2008)
(47) Thomas Hughes, Economic Journal (January 1893)
(48) Chris Bryant, Possible Dreams: A Personal History of the British Christian Socialist (1996) page 53
(49) Thomas Hughes, Memoir of a Brother (1873) page 111
(50) Percy Redfern, The Story of the CWS: 1863-1913 (1913) page 13
(51) Brenda Colloms, Victorian Visionaries (1982) pages 94-95
(52) Chris Bryant, Possible Dreams: A Personal History of the British Christian Socialist (1996) page 53
(53) Thomas Hughes, Memoir of a Brother (1873) page 117 Gillian Darley, Octavia Hill: A Life (1990) page 41
(54) Caroline Southwood Hill, Household Words (17th May 1856)
(55) Gillian Darley, Octavia Hill: A Life (1990) page 51
(56) Alan Wilkinson, Christian Socialism (1998) page 19
(57) Percy Redfern, The Story of the CWS: 1863-1913 (1913) page 28
(58) Owen Chadwick, The Victorian Church (1966) page 352-353
(59) Norman Moore, John Malcolm Forbes Ludlow: Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (1912)
(60) Brenda Colloms, Victorian Visionaries (1982) page 142
(61) Bernard Reardon, Frederick Denison Maurice: Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (25th May, 2006)
(62) William A. Greenhill, Richard William Jelf: The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (1900)
(63) Statement signed by over a thousand working-men, representing around a hundred occupations, on the dismissal of Frederick Denison Maurice (27th December 1853)
(64) Frederick Denison Maurice, letter to Charles Kingsley (10th January, 1854)
(65) Brenda Colloms, Victorian Visionaries (1982) page 144
(66) Chris Bryant, Possible Dreams: A Personal History of the British Christian Socialist (1996) page 59
(67) Bernard Reardon, Frederick Denison Maurice: Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (25th May, 2006)
(68) Brenda Colloms, Victorian Visionaries (1982) pages 145-150
xxx